Stem Cells in Birth Defects Research and Developmental Toxicology 2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781119283249.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Assessment Using Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Recent Advances in Developmental Toxicity Screens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Developmental toxicity may be elicited by toxicants due to the cytotoxic nature of the exposure, or because the toxicant alters cell fate trajectories in the absence of cytotoxicity [ 34 ]. Unsurprisingly, therefore, and speaking to the first possibility, all tested tobacco products caused a decline in survival rates that was more severe upon exposure to the three conventional products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developmental toxicity may be elicited by toxicants due to the cytotoxic nature of the exposure, or because the toxicant alters cell fate trajectories in the absence of cytotoxicity [ 34 ]. Unsurprisingly, therefore, and speaking to the first possibility, all tested tobacco products caused a decline in survival rates that was more severe upon exposure to the three conventional products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our long-term goal is to develop an effective in vitro platform for teratogenicity screening by establishing a novel culture protocol for the differentiation of human ES cell aggregates. To date, various in vitro assays have been devised in efforts to detect teratogenic exposures, many of which utilize mouse or human ES cells [4,[30][31][32][33]. Inclusion of human ES cells is particularly critical in light of certain chemicals, such as thalidomide, impacting human but not mouse embryogenesis [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing MS and SS smoke solutions, our study supported the notion that tobacco has detrimental effects on human osteogenic differentiation with SS smoke, which burns off the tip of the cigarette [ 10 ], being more developmentally osteotoxic than MS smoke, which is the smoke actively inhaled by the smoker. Generally, developmental toxicity may be elicited by toxicants due to the cytotoxic nature of the exposure, because the toxicant alters cell fate trajectories in the absence of cytotoxicity [ 11 ], or by a combination of both. Intriguingly, sidestream smoke solutions from harm-reduction products elicited differentiation defects at sub-toxic concentrations, while developmental effects for conventional tobacco product solutions followed their general cytotoxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%