2011
DOI: 10.1080/13552600.2010.528844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment with female sex offenders: Can women meet the criteria of community protection laws?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce the possibility of a high false alarm rate, the recidivism risk factors clinically judged to be relevant in a given case must be sufficiently present -in fact quite blatant (e.g., she tells you she will do it again; see Cortoni et al, 2010) -in order to make a determination of high risk for sexual recidivism among women (for a discussion of issues related to the assessment of women for civil commitment, see Vess 2011).…”
Section: Implications For Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the possibility of a high false alarm rate, the recidivism risk factors clinically judged to be relevant in a given case must be sufficiently present -in fact quite blatant (e.g., she tells you she will do it again; see Cortoni et al, 2010) -in order to make a determination of high risk for sexual recidivism among women (for a discussion of issues related to the assessment of women for civil commitment, see Vess 2011).…”
Section: Implications For Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, Vess (2011), asserts gender-specific assessments should be conducted to discover factors that contribute to female sex offending. Justice policymakers must recognize that FSOs exist and must be provided proper gender and case specific treatment in correctional settings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La predicción del riesgo en delincuentes juveniles parece ser igualmente efectiva en chicos y chicas, dándose más diferencias en la toma de decisiones profesionales y el trato que se da a los casos que en la capacidad predictiva de las herramientas (Schwalbe, 2008). Respecto al riesgo de otros tipos de violencia, por un lado se seña-la que la baja cifra de delincuentes sexuales ha dificultado el desarrollo de estudios en la materia, obteniéndose muchos falsos positivos y no recomendándose la utilización de herramientas actuariales (Vess, 2011), que fundamentan la decisión en ecuaciones matemáticas derivadas de aplicaciones en muestras concretas. En agresoras de pareja, la investigación sobre evaluación del riesgo es muy deficitaria (véase Nicholls, Pritchard, Reeves y Hilterman, 2013), aunque se señala que estas pueden compartir con los varones los principales factores de riesgo utilizados en las herramientas para la evaluación del riesgo de VCP (Simmons, Lehmann y Cobb, 2008;Storey y Strand, 2012).…”
Section: ) Agreden Por Presión 2) Con Problemas De Regulación Emociounclassified