Risk Attitude and Risk Controllability: Their Implications on the Subjective Quantification of Risk in International Construction Projects

Hayat, Ehsanullah

doi:10.22161/ijaers.4.10.6

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The risk field is wide-ranging, interdisciplinary and includes several philosophical issues in epistemology, philosophy of science and psychology topics. The distinction between know-how and know-that [13,65] , the meaning of knowledge as the "epistemically most justified beliefs" [66] , the risk field as a scientific discipline [8,10,67] , the influences of human cognitive system [61,68,69] and behavior [70][71][72] , and the implications of the probability interpretations [33,73] are some examples of the fundamental topics of research.…”

Section: Discussion and Recent Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Timeline of the Risk Field: Bridging Fundamental Achievements and Modern Research

Costa¹,

Sousa²,

Chagas³

2022

IJAERS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An evolutionary, diverse, and complex path of the risk conceptualization has been built along with the history of mankind. The current understanding and the variety of methods available to deal with risk and uncertainty are linked to the achievements made by several academics and researchers in the past. However, very little of the risk analysis literature has attempt to explicitly bridge or recognize this fundamental construction for organizational and research purposes. This conceptual paper presents the results of a literature research in a timeline framework. The significant accomplishments that collaborated to the modern knowledge in the field of risk are organized in five distinct phases and their connections to modern research topics are discussed. The aim is to provide a condensed but comprehensive overview of the foundations and evolution of the risk field and link the different conceptual paths that currently exist in risk analysis research. The present paper contributes to a systemic view of the risk discipline, which we believe will be a helpful review from which academy and industry readers would benefit.

show abstract

Section: Discussion and Recent Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Timeline of the Risk Field: Bridging Fundamental Achievements and Modern Research

Costa¹,

Sousa²,

Chagas³

2022

IJAERS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, some researchers suggested that RA highly depends on practitioners' experience, role, and viewpoints (Dikmen et al, 2018;Hayat, 2017;Xia et al, 2017). However, the RGB literature currently lacks studies investigating the effect of practitioners' characteristics on the RA process in GB projects.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk management in green building: a review of the current state of research and future directions

Nguyen

Macchion

2022

Environ Dev Sustain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has been considerable interest in investigating risk factors in Green Building (GB) projects, with increasing debates in recent years. This study aims to investigate tendencies and identify gaps in the GB risk literature, which can define future research guidelines, with an extensive analysis of the latest contributions. A systematic literature review was conducted by analyzing 64 relevant studies from 2006 to 2020. The results revealed that the GB risk topic is somewhat nascent but growing and almost limited to several countries, including Singapore, the USA, Australia, and China. Notably, this research discovered and classified the main themes of GB risk studies: (1) identify risk factors in implementing GB projects, (2) create risk assessment models for GB projects, (3) study according to specific types of GB risks, and (4) investigate risks in green retrofit projects. Also, a comprehensive list of GB risk factors was provided that could be a helpful reference for industry practitioners and future researchers. Furthermore, this research identified gaps in the current literature, such as inconsistency in identifying GB risk factors, lack of investigation of the relationship between GB risks and project outcomes, and lack of exploring in cross-country or developing countries. Finally, this research suggested future research directions to enrich the literature. Thus, this study contributes a valuable platform for both practitioners and researchers to comprehend the development of the GB risk literature.

show abstract

Modified Mamdani-fuzzy inference system for predicting the cost overrun of construction projects

Al-Nahhas,

Hadidi,

Islam

et al. 2024

Applied Soft Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Risk Attitude and Risk Controllability: Their Implications on the Subjective Quantification of Risk in International Construction Projects

Abstract: Abstract-The Probability-Impact (P-I) risk matrix is

Cited by 3 publications

References 36 publications

A Timeline of the Risk Field: Bridging Fundamental Achievements and Modern Research

A Timeline of the Risk Field: Bridging Fundamental Achievements and Modern Research

Risk management in green building: a review of the current state of research and future directions

Modified Mamdani-fuzzy inference system for predicting the cost overrun of construction projects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About