2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk-based determination of design pressure of LNG fuel storage tanks based on dynamic process simulation combined with Monte Carlo method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We see a wide range of industrial applications for this kind of model. Our brief review shows that a combination of operations and reliability modelling has been made for (i) a nickel reduction plant production line [55], (ii) dynamic process simulation of a LNG fuel storage tanks risk assessment [56], (iii) extended warranty cost prediction [57], (iv) availability of offshore installation [58] and manufacturing lines [59]. Also, maintenance spare part circulation [60] could be modelled with OpenMARS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We see a wide range of industrial applications for this kind of model. Our brief review shows that a combination of operations and reliability modelling has been made for (i) a nickel reduction plant production line [55], (ii) dynamic process simulation of a LNG fuel storage tanks risk assessment [56], (iii) extended warranty cost prediction [57], (iv) availability of offshore installation [58] and manufacturing lines [59]. Also, maintenance spare part circulation [60] could be modelled with OpenMARS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After critically scrutinizing the identified literature, our analysis resulted in 47 journal articles (Shindo et al, 2000;Kim et al, 2005;Ochiai et al, 2005;Ronza et al, 2006;Han et al, 2008;Vanem et al, 2008;Raj and Lemoff, 2009;Yun et al, 2009;Nwaoha et al, 2010;Vinnem, 2010;Nwaoha et al, 2011;Parihar et al, 2011;Tanabe and Miyake, 2011;Keshavarz et al, 2012;Khalil et al, 2012;Li and Huang, 2012;Rathnayaka et al, 2012;Berle et al, 2013;Chu et al, 2013;Nwaoha et al, 2013;Aneziris et al, 2014;Dan et al, 2014;Elsayed et al, 2014;Martins et al, 2014;Mcinerney et al, 2014;Noh et al, 2014;Vianello and Maschio, 2014a;Vianello and Maschio, 2014b;Ahmed et al, 2015;Giardina and Morale, 2015;Lee et al, 2015;Martinez and Lambert, 2015;Fu et al, 2016;Martins et al, 2016;Yeo et al, 2016;Ahn et al, 2017;Jeong et al, 2017;Renjith et al, 2018;Baalisampang et al, 2019;Badida et al, 2019;George et al, 2019;…”
Section: Search and Review Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Недолік такого підходу полягає у тому, що на сьогодні не достатньо розроблений інструментарій для адекватного врахування усього спектру явищ, пов'язаних зі зміною навантаження елементів. У статтях [5,6] використовують моделі надійності, які ґрунтуються на імітаційному моде люванні за методом Монте-Карло. Результати, одержані за цим методом, спотворені флуктуаціями, спричиненими застосуванням генера-тора випадкових чисел.…”
Section: аналіз літературних даних та постановка проблемиunclassified