DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-17051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk based multi-objective security control and congestion management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, the performance of RM with several existing methods are compared. The risk-based OPF method (RB-OPF) [8] and a variant of ref. [16] are tested in this case.…”
Section: B Effectiveness Of Rmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the performance of RM with several existing methods are compared. The risk-based OPF method (RB-OPF) [8] and a variant of ref. [16] are tested in this case.…”
Section: B Effectiveness Of Rmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After pre-contingency power flow is solved with DC power flow assumptions, the post-contingency circuit flows can be expressed as linear functions of node power injections using line outage distribution factors (LODFs) [5].…”
Section: Security-constrained Dc-opf Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have addressed this weakness by proposing the risk-based direct-current (DC) optimal power flow (RBOPF) [2][3][4][5][6][7] which also optimizes an economic criterion but uses a quantitative risk metric to assess operating conditions. The fundamental difference between SCOPF and RBOPF is that whereas SCOPF imposes constraints on postcontingency flows, the RBOPF imposes a single constraint on risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Index k denotes system state, while k=0 represents the normal condition, and k>0 represents post-contingency conditions. Equation The benchmark RBOPF [78] problem can be formulated as follows:…”
Section: Formulations Of Scopf Rbopf and Rb-scopfmentioning
confidence: 99%