2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk dynamics surrounding the issuance of convertible bonds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They conclude that not all issuers use convertible debt financing to reduce agency conflicts. Zeidler et al (2012) confirm the decrease in systematic equity risk for the years 1980-2002 and document that this change is more pronounced for small firms.…”
Section: Convertible Debt and Risk-shiftingsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…They conclude that not all issuers use convertible debt financing to reduce agency conflicts. Zeidler et al (2012) confirm the decrease in systematic equity risk for the years 1980-2002 and document that this change is more pronounced for small firms.…”
Section: Convertible Debt and Risk-shiftingsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…We find that PIPE firms have significantly higher skewness than control firms, indicating that the PIPE has increased the optionality of the issuing firms. This result is consistent with Zeidler, Mietzner, and Schiereck (2012) who offer a real option explanation of the apparent underperformance of convertible debt issuances. They argue that issuing convertible debt is the exercise of a growth option, and since growth options are riskier than the underlying assets, their exercise reduces risk and hence commensurately reduces the required return.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The overwhelming evidence shows a negative post-issuance valuation effect (Abhyankar and Dunning 1999;Agarwal et al 2011;Bechmann 2004;Carpentier, L'Her, and Suret 2013;Chou et al 2009;Duca et al 2012;Lewis, Rogalski, and Seward 2001;Lin et al 2013;Rahim, Goodacre, and Veld 2014;Zeidler, Mietzner, and Schiereck 2012). Rahim, Goodacre, and Veld (2014) conducted a meta study of 35 studies across 84 samples and 6,310 announcements and found a negative wealth effect of 1.14%; US issuances of convertibles were associated with more negative wealth effects (an additional 1.11%).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a debt component in a hybrid instrument allows financing to be managed in difficult times. The conversion price being higher than the market price helps the issuer avoid the purchase of stock by undesired investors and may protect against a takeover (Zeidlera et al, 2012). The issuance of straight debt in times of crisis may stimulate the risk of bankruptcy.…”
Section: Theoretical Premises Behind the Use Of The Call/put Optmentioning
confidence: 99%