2019
DOI: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2019.en-1625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk evaluation of chemical contaminants in food in the context of RASFF notifications

Abstract: In accordance with Regulation (EU) No. 16/2011, the exceedance of a legal limit, i.e. ‘non‐compliance’ with a regulatory framework (European or National) does not systematically trigger a RASFF notification. An evaluation on the level of risk is necessary to decide if a notification should be issued. EFSA was requested to propose a risk evaluation methodology that would allow a rapid and consistent risk‐based classification of RASFF notifications. The methodology aims to provide a transparent set of criteria t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 7 ] The USA, China, and European Union stipulate that the highest permissible concentration of PAT in foodstuff is 50 µg kg −1 . [ 8 ] Regarding as its hazardous effect, the detoxification of PAT is necessary from food products to achieve more severe quality standards and safety necessities. Moreover, PAT has been noticed in different concentration in numerous industrial effluents, sewage effluents and other waste water ensuing in environmental hazards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 7 ] The USA, China, and European Union stipulate that the highest permissible concentration of PAT in foodstuff is 50 µg kg −1 . [ 8 ] Regarding as its hazardous effect, the detoxification of PAT is necessary from food products to achieve more severe quality standards and safety necessities. Moreover, PAT has been noticed in different concentration in numerous industrial effluents, sewage effluents and other waste water ensuing in environmental hazards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output from RASNEX can be processed using the BfR FoodChain-Lab environment as well as be used as an input for other risk management applications. One example is the usage of the EFSA RACE tool [6] for retrospective risk evaluation using past RASFF notification analytical results (in an extension of the RACE use case intended by EFSA, prospective decision-making to report in RASFF). Laboratory analytical results can be extracted from RASFF using RASNEX and then be used as an input for the EFSA RACE tool.…”
Section: Advantages and Challenges Using Rasnexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RASFF is under the control of the European Commission and nationally in Germany under the following institutional contact: National RASFF-und AAC-Kontaktstelle outbreak from the European RASFF notifications and compile related information in sheets, thereby enabling the use of this data for further analysis with other tools (e.g. FoodChain-Lab [5], RACE [6] or other future tools). RASNEX generates a graphical mapping of all actors of the supply network known and extracted by the software and involved in contamination events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A 2-day sub-acute toxicity test of arsenic and 7-day sub-chronic toxicity test was carried out on adult catfish (8 months, 2 kg body weights). Five fishes were treated with arsenic 0.5-4 M in 15 L aquarium tank filled to 1/2 level with de-chlorinated water for the subacute toxicity test 15 . Five doses were prepared and used (0.1, 1, 2, and 4 M) using 2 fold dilution method alongside the control groups in this experiment.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Toxicity Effect Of Arsenicmentioning
confidence: 99%