2019
DOI: 10.1080/17565529.2019.1630351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk experience and smallholder farmers’ climate change adaptation decision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the possibility for the year-round availability of fodder was observed as the main reason for sustaining the practices after adoption. Such findings correspond with those of Habtemariam [23] and Hansen [24], who highlighted the possible mitigating role of especially land-based related technologies against the effects of climate change as a determining factor for smallholder farmers' adoption decisions. The authors further added that a climate-risk related adoption decision could be especially true for farmers perceived to have experienced past production shocks as a result of less certainty in climate patterns.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the possibility for the year-round availability of fodder was observed as the main reason for sustaining the practices after adoption. Such findings correspond with those of Habtemariam [23] and Hansen [24], who highlighted the possible mitigating role of especially land-based related technologies against the effects of climate change as a determining factor for smallholder farmers' adoption decisions. The authors further added that a climate-risk related adoption decision could be especially true for farmers perceived to have experienced past production shocks as a result of less certainty in climate patterns.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Moreover, Fowler and Rockstrom [22] remarked that the favourable conditions required for adopting new technologies by smallholder farmers must include positive chances of affordability, less complexity, local resource-base and less effect or dependence on peak labour demands. Other studies highlighted the possible mitigating role of such land-based-related technologies (e.g., improved forages) against climate risk as a determining factor for smallholder farmers' adoption decisions [23,24]. Such climate-risk-related adoption decisions could be especially true for farmers perceived to have experienced past production shocks as a result of less certainty in climate patterns.…”
Section: Conceptual Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another reason could be that most agricultural activities in Nigeria are labour intensive due to low mechanization; large household size therefore constitutes a source of labour to enable households engage in adaptation practices and other agricultural practices such as tree planting, soil conservation and other crop management practices. This result is in agreement with the findings of Shikuku et al, (2017), Ali & Erenstein (2017), Habtemariam et al, (2020) and Diallo, Donkor, & Owusu (2021) who found that large households are more likely to adopt adaptation strategies such as changing planting date, improved varieties and planting of trees.…”
Section: Determinants Of Choice Of Adaptation Strategies By Farming H...supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Households cannot adapt to what they do not perceive or experience. Some studies show that farmers who perceive or experience climate related risks are more likely to plan for adaptation (Al-Amin et al, 2019;Habtemariam et al, 2020;Mahmood et al, 2021) Furthermore, descriptive analysis presented the annual temperature and rainfall data for the region for the period between 1982 and 2018 as shown in Figures 3, 4, and 5. This also validated the local perception of the long-term change in temperature and rainfall.…”
Section: Household Characteristics and Climatic Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bogale, 2015 in Africa; Panda et al, 2013 in South Asia); and decision making in the face of risk (e.g. Habtemariam et al, 2019). Agricultural crops that are represented include cereals (maize, rice), fruits (apples, pineapples) and beverage crops (coffee), whilst livestock that are represented include goats, cattle and camels (including through pastoralism).…”
Section: Sectoral Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%