2007
DOI: 10.5330/prsc.10.3.w26024vvw6541gv7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors and Levels of Risk for High School Dropouts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Suh and Satcher (2005) suggested that at-risk factors Korean American Youths have faced included insensitive and discriminatory school personnel, peer harassment, cultural discrepancies, language deficiency, lack of parental involvement in school, and unfamiliar concept of self and low self-esteem by identity confusion, which could bring about a sense of alienation, feelings of helplessness and hopelessness. When Korean American youths face multiple at-risk factors, they might lose their motivation to do school work, and finally they might drop out of school (Suh and Suh 2007). Some of the potential issues or challenges Korean American youths have wrestled with are also applicable to Korean ESA adolescents including the four focal students in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Suh and Satcher (2005) suggested that at-risk factors Korean American Youths have faced included insensitive and discriminatory school personnel, peer harassment, cultural discrepancies, language deficiency, lack of parental involvement in school, and unfamiliar concept of self and low self-esteem by identity confusion, which could bring about a sense of alienation, feelings of helplessness and hopelessness. When Korean American youths face multiple at-risk factors, they might lose their motivation to do school work, and finally they might drop out of school (Suh and Suh 2007). Some of the potential issues or challenges Korean American youths have wrestled with are also applicable to Korean ESA adolescents including the four focal students in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suh and Satcher (2005) suggested that at-risk factors such as insensitive and discriminatory school personnel, peer harassment, cultural discrepancies, language deficiency, retention, lack of counseling services could bring about a sense of alienation, feelings of helplessness and hopelessness. When Korean American youths face multiple at-risk factors, they might lose their motivation to do school work, and finally they might drop out of school (Suh and Suh 2007). Especially, three variables, low GPA, suspension (behavioral problems), and low SES (socio-economic status), have been identified by researchers as risk factors that have critical effect on high school drop-out rates.…”
Section: Understanding Immigrant Youthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As empirically supported by the existing literature, academic and behavioral variables have been consistently found to contribute to school attrition (Bear et al, 2006;Bost, 2006;Cobb et al, 2006;Dunn et al, 2005;French & Conrad, 2001;Scanlon & Mellard, 2002;Suh & Suh, 2007). Given the academic and behavioral problems students with SLD and EBD often experience and manifest, both populations are considered at a greater risk for dropping out.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…These findings support Rea et al's (2002) conclusions, which indicated that students with disabilities in inclusive settings performed better academically, as well as this study's contention that inclusion can be implemented as a potential dropout prevention variable for students with disabilities. Moreover, given previously stated findings which indicated that low academic achievement increases dropout (e.g., Bear et al, 2006;Blackorby & Wagner, 1996;Dunn et al, 2004;Suh & Suh, 2007), extensive consideration must be given to the idea that students in inclusion classes experience significantly better academic results than their selfcontained counterparts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%