2015
DOI: 10.5152/dir.2014.14308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors associated with late aneurysmal sac expansion after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Abstract: Risk factors associated with late aneurysmal sac expansion after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGINGORIGINAL ARTICLE PURPOSE We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with late aneurysmal sac expansion after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images of 143 patients who were followed for ≥6 months after EVAR. Sac expansion was defined as an increase in sac diameter of 5 mm rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
10
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas our rate of no identifiable endoleak among patients with sac expansion was high at 57%, other centers have also shown high rates ranging from 22% to 43%. 3032 The reason for the discrepancy in our rate and the rate of others is perhaps because sac expansion in our cohort could have been defined on the basis of ultrasound alone, and it is unclear whether these patients underwent imaging that could have identified an endoleak, whereas in other studies, all patients underwent computed tomography imaging. Other potential explanations include the possibility of a methodologic error inherent in the VSGNE data set in which endoleaks are self-reported by participating centers without any core imaging laboratory adjudication.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Whereas our rate of no identifiable endoleak among patients with sac expansion was high at 57%, other centers have also shown high rates ranging from 22% to 43%. 3032 The reason for the discrepancy in our rate and the rate of others is perhaps because sac expansion in our cohort could have been defined on the basis of ultrasound alone, and it is unclear whether these patients underwent imaging that could have identified an endoleak, whereas in other studies, all patients underwent computed tomography imaging. Other potential explanations include the possibility of a methodologic error inherent in the VSGNE data set in which endoleaks are self-reported by participating centers without any core imaging laboratory adjudication.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Not surprisingly, highly angulated aortic necks have also been associated with higher rates of sac expansion, endograft migration, and endoleaks. 11,43 Moreover, according to most of EP members conical-shaped Fig. 2.…”
Section: Orange Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoleaks are frequent after EVAR and have been shown to occur in 20% to 25% of case, and more commonly in the first two years following intervention . Preoperative risk factors for endoleak following EVAR include aneurysm length, increased infrarenal angulation at the aneurysm neck, large diameter patent collateral vessels, and increased age of the patient . Postoperative factors include increasing aneurysm size and the use of earlier generation devices…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%