2018
DOI: 10.1002/dc.23923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors associated with malignancy and with triage to surgery in thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda category IV (FN/SFN)

Abstract: Our findings showed that using predictive factors for malignancy in the Bethesda IV category as risk indices, 17% of patients who had nodules without any risk factors could be spared surgery. Predictive indices could be considered for the malignancy risk and for selection of patients for surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, solidity, hypoechogenicity, irregular margins, taller-than-wide shape, microcalcifications and posterior echo attenuation associated with malignant nodules, whereas regular halo associated with benign nodules. Furthermore, taller-than-wide shape, microcalcifications, hypoechogenicity and irregular margins were independent risk factors for malignancy, consistent with the results of previous studies ( 15 , 18 , 39 , 40 , 41 ). Taller-than-wide shape is a highly specific indicator of thyroid cancer, with studies reporting a specificity of 81.5–98.5% for malignant thyroid nodules with a taller-than-wide shape ( 15 , 23 , 42 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, solidity, hypoechogenicity, irregular margins, taller-than-wide shape, microcalcifications and posterior echo attenuation associated with malignant nodules, whereas regular halo associated with benign nodules. Furthermore, taller-than-wide shape, microcalcifications, hypoechogenicity and irregular margins were independent risk factors for malignancy, consistent with the results of previous studies ( 15 , 18 , 39 , 40 , 41 ). Taller-than-wide shape is a highly specific indicator of thyroid cancer, with studies reporting a specificity of 81.5–98.5% for malignant thyroid nodules with a taller-than-wide shape ( 15 , 23 , 42 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, ultrasonography can guide FNA, which can reduce the generation of non-diagnostic specimens. Ultrasound features, such as solidity, hypoechogenicity, microcalcifications, taller-than-wide shape and irregular margins, are useful in the diagnosis of malignant nodules ( 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ). Furthermore, other studies have reported that a simple cystic and spongiform appearance have a higher negative predictive value (NPV) for malignancy ( 13 , 19 , 20 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we observed irregular borders, hypoechogenicity, microcalcifications, being taller than wide, and components of the nodules all increased the risk for malignancy in thyroid nodules. This finding is in accordance with a study by Kure et al Brito et al demonstrated that being taller than wide had the highest diagnostic OR for judging the malignancy of thyroid nodules compared to other graphic ultrasound features. In our study, a relationship between the dimension of being taller than wide and risk of cancer was observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2009, the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) has had a well-established role in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules (TNs) 1,2 . Among the six categories in this classification, the third category is known as “atypia of undetermined significance and follicular lesion of undetermined significance” (AUS/FLUS), and the fourth category is known as “follicular neoplasm and suspicious for follicular neoplasm” (FN/SFN) 1,3 . The Bethesda categories III and IV describe varying risks of malignancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the great clinical dilemma surrounding the management of thyroid nodules in the AUS/FLUS and FN/SFN categories and the variability in the rates of malignancy in these categories, this subject still garners much discussion. Though the risk of malignancy for category III and IV TNs has been estimated, some authors suggest, that the risk of malignancy for patients with AUS/FLUS and FN/SFN category nodules depends upon the specific clinical situation 3,6 . Others point out that, when using predictive factors for malignancy for the categories of AUS/FLUS and FN/SFN as a risk index, 17% of individuals without the risk factors do not need surgery 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%