1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00121-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors associated with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

42
289
9
18

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 452 publications
(358 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
42
289
9
18
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several studies have demonstrated the validity and reliability of these questions in identifying cases of GERD. 1,2,11,[26][27][28] Symptoms assessed by questionnaire have correlated with objective complications of GERD, such as esophagitis and esophageal adenocarcinoma. 29,30 Furthermore, to improve our specificity for GERD we restricted our primary endpoint to women who reported at least weekly symptoms.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several studies have demonstrated the validity and reliability of these questions in identifying cases of GERD. 1,2,11,[26][27][28] Symptoms assessed by questionnaire have correlated with objective complications of GERD, such as esophagitis and esophageal adenocarcinoma. 29,30 Furthermore, to improve our specificity for GERD we restricted our primary endpoint to women who reported at least weekly symptoms.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body mass index (BMI; in kg/m 2 ) was calculated and was categorized as underweight (<21, equivalent to below the 5th percentile of our study participants) and, according to the World Health Organization classification, normal (21 to <25), overweight (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30), class 1 obesity (>30-35), class 2 obesity (>35-40), and class 3 obesity (>40, equivalent to above the 95th percentile of our study participants). Waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio were categorized into 6 categories, based on their distribution percentiles among our study participants with equivalent to <5th (referred to as lowest), 5th-25th (referred to as normal and used as reference), 26th-50th, 51st-75th, 76th-95th, and >95th (referred to as highest) percentiles.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the outcome was rare (≈3%), the odds ratio (OR) closely approximates the relative risk. Because hormone therapy decreases waist circumference, [19][20][21] which is associated with GER, 13,15,16,25 to examine the effect of hormone therapy on symptomatic GER through pathways other than the waist circumference pathway, we adjusted for waist circumference change in separate analyses. To study the progress of symptomatic GER, we calculated a symptom change score, which was the difference of score (none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3) at 1 year to that at baseline.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) The odds ratios (ORs) of GERS among smokers compared to non-smokers have been in the range of 1.3 to 2.5. Tobacco smoking increases the risk of GERS by reducing the lower esophageal sphincter pressure, facilitating gastric acid to reach the esophagus, (10)(11)(12) and reducing the salivary bicarbonate secretion, which neutralizes the acidity of the gastric contents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%