SummaryAlthough a large body of research has studied the factors associated to general recidivism, predictive validity of these factors has received less attention. Andrews and Bonta's General Personality and Social Psychological Model (2006) Protective factors differentiated between recidivists and nonrecidivists in all factors. Hence, results showed that not only individual but also social factors would be crucial in predicting recidivism.Key words: Recidivism, risk and protective factors, delinquency, YLS/CMI, juvenile offender.
3Criminal behaviour, and in particular juvenile crime, may be regarded as an issue of major concern in today's society. Although the general level of youth offending does not seem to have increased, there has been a steady rise in recorded violent crime since 1991 (National Health Service in England and Wales, 2004;Rennie & Dolan, 2010).Specifically, in Spain (where minors from 14 to 17 years old are judged under the juvenile system), an increase in general violent crimes, sexual assaults and severe crimes in the family and school context have been found in the last ten years (Benavente, 2009;Capdevila, Ferrer & Luque, 2005;Pérez, 2010). Moreover, the reoffending rate ranged between 5 and 25%, depending on the type of crime (Capdevila et al., 2005;Iborra, Rodríguez, Serrano & Martínez, 2011). In this context, intervention in youth recidivism becomes critical, that is, to help preventing them from continuing their criminal career into adulthood, on a life-course-persistent trajectory (Moffit, 2006).Recidivism is not only a concern because of the impact on the public, but because of the impact on the quality of life of recidivating juveniles: increasing levels of alcohol/drug use (Becker, Kerig, Lim & Ezechukwu, 2012), personal discomfort and conflict (Gendreau, Little & Goggin, 1996), psychopathy (Salekin, 2008) and even high mortality risk (Coffey, Lovett, Cini, Patton, Wolfe & Moran, 2004).The concept of risk factors, and consequently protective factors, has become very important. A risk factor for offending is a variable that predicts a high probability of later offending (Farrington, Loeber & Ttofi, 2012;Ribeaud & Eisner, 2010). Some authors (Haines & Case, 2008) point out that risk factors can vary greatly. The same diversity applies to protective factors, which can be considered variables that predict a low probability of offending among persons exposed to risk factors (Farrington et al., 2012;Hartman, Turner, Daigle, Exum & Cullen, 2009 role. This study therefore includes both types of factors, while at the same time recognizing their independent nature (Haines & Case, 2008;Hoge, Andrews & Leschied, 1996). Social learning theories (Catalano & Hawkins, 1996;Andrews & Bonta, 2006) try to structure the wide range of risk and protective factors in accordance with their theoretical assumptions. These theories are mainly based on the fact that behaviour is interiorized through interaction with the environment, so criminal conduct will be more likely in youths who perceive more rewar...