Risk factors for avian influenza virus in backyard poultry flocks and environments in Zhejiang Province, China: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

BackgroundHuman infection of avian influenza virus (AIV) remains a great concern. Although live poultry markets are believed to be associated with human infections, ever more infections have been reported in rural areas with backyard poultry, especially in the fifth epidemic of H7N9. However, limited information is available on backyard poultry infection and surrounding environmental contamination.MethodsTwo surveillance systems and a field survey were used to collect data and samples in Zhejiang Province. In total, 4538 samples were collected by surveillance systems and 3171 from the field survey between May 2015 and May 2017, while 352 backyard poultry owners were interviewed in May 2017 by questionnaire to investigate factors influencing the prevalence of avian influenza A virus and other AIV subtypes. RT-PCR was used to test the nucleic acids of viruses. ArcGIS 10.1 software was used to generate maps. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for AIV infection.ResultsOf the 428 poultry premises observed by the surveillance system, 53 (12.38%) were positive for influenza A virus. Of the 352 samples from poultry premises observed by field survey, 13 (3.39%) were positive for influenza A virus. The prevalence of AIV was unevenly distributed and the dominant subtype differed among cities. Eastern (Shaoxing and Ningbo) and southern (Wenzhou) cities exhibited a higher prevalence of AIV (16.33, 8.94, and 7.30% respectively). Contamination of AIV subtypes was most severe in January, especially in 2016 (23.26%, 70/301). The positive rate of subtype H5/H7/H9 was 2.53% (115/4538). Subtype H5 was the least prevalent, while subtypes H7 and H9 had similar positivity rates (1.50 and 1.32% respectively). Poultry flocks and environmental samples had a similar prevalence of AIV (4.46% vs 5.06%). The type of live birds was a risk factor and the sanitary condition of the setting was a protective factor against influenza A contamination.ConclusionsAIV subtypes were prevalent in backyard poultry flocks and surrounding environments in Zhejiang Province. The types of live birds and sanitary conditions of the environment were associated with influenza A contamination. These findings shine a light on the characteristics of contamination of AIV subtypes and emphasize the importance of reducing AIV circulation in backyard poultry settings.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s40249-018-0445-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Poultry trading behaviours in Vietnamese live bird markets as risk factors for avian influenza infection in chickens

“…Indeed, rest days/nights are an important component of long‐term AIV control but are not sufficient alone to eliminate infection (Kung et al, ). Furthermore, risk factor studies in LBMs have shown that having a greater variety of poultry species, including ducks being sold alongside other species, having poor sanitary conditions, storing poultry in floor pens instead of cages and having ≥1 wholesaler trading in LBMs, all increase the odds of having AIV‐infected poultry and/or having AIV‐contaminated environments (Kim et al, ; Kirunda et al, ; Santhia et al, ; Sayeed et al, ; Wang et al, ).…”

Avian influenza at animal‐human interface: One‐health challenge in live poultry retail stalls of Chakwal, Pakistan

“…Cross-sectional studies are also relatively weaker in establishing causality of risk factors than with an analytic design, such as with a cohort study. 61 Well-designed prospective epidemiological studies with follow-up of human and their birds will be better suited to answer such questions. 46 The authors acknowledge that including control human sera from repository of a private laboratory in Chakwal, which were not collected in the same time frame in which the butchers' sera were collected, might have introduced bias in our results.…”

“…Furthermore, the current study was a cross‐sectional survey; these study designs are not suited to estimate disease incidence, natural history of disease, or the rate of secondary human‐to‐human infection. Cross‐sectional studies are also relatively weaker in establishing causality of risk factors than with an analytic design, such as with a cohort study . Well‐designed prospective epidemiological studies with follow‐up of human and their birds will be better suited to answer such questions .…”

Host Innate Immune Response of Geese Infected with Clade 2.3.4.4 H5N6 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses

“…Among these viruses, H5N6 HPAIVs has crossed the species barrier and caused human infection cases, posing a new threat to public health in China. Notably, among these human infection cases, most of the patients have had a contact history with the infected poultry in live poultry markets (LPMs) or backyard poultry flocks (BPFs), which are considered the major risk factors in human infection cases [24,25]. Recent epidemiological study demonstrated that H5N6 HPAIVs have replaced H5N1 HPAIVs as the dominant subtype in waterfowls in Southern China.…”