2001
DOI: 10.1053/jhin.2001.0984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for central vascular catheter-associated bloodstream infections among patients in a neonatal intensive care unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
65
4
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
65
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In some countries, nasocomial bloodstream infections are observed in approximately half of the hospitalized patients and the mortality rate is increased up to 52% (11). The rate of nasocomial infection is reported to be 7% in Europe, 11.4% in USA and 16.7% in Spain (12)(13)(14). In the prospective 6-year study performed by Yap›c›o¤lu et al (15), the rate of infection was reported to range between 14% and 29% by years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In some countries, nasocomial bloodstream infections are observed in approximately half of the hospitalized patients and the mortality rate is increased up to 52% (11). The rate of nasocomial infection is reported to be 7% in Europe, 11.4% in USA and 16.7% in Spain (12)(13)(14). In the prospective 6-year study performed by Yap›c›o¤lu et al (15), the rate of infection was reported to range between 14% and 29% by years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…6,7,12,[17][18][19][20] CRBSIs in hospitalized neonates are most frequently caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]17,18 Whereas the prophylactic use of systemic antibiotics at the time of catheter insertion has not been shown to reduce the incidence of catheter-related infection 21,22 by guest on May 9, 2018 http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ Downloaded from nal contaminants, has been shown to reduce the incidence of CRBSI in adults 24 and older children 25 with cuffed and tunneled central venous catheters. However, concerns have been raised that this novel form of local, extracorporeal, antimicrobial prophylaxis will promote resistance to vancomycin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas most infections with short-term catheters derive from skin organisms that gain access extraluminally, [13][14][15][16] contamination of the catheter hub and lumen seems to be the predominant mechanism of CRBSI with long-term central venous catheters, including peripherally inserted central venous catheters. 6,7,12,[17][18][19][20] CRBSIs in hospitalized neonates are most frequently caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]17,18 Whereas the prophylactic use of systemic antibiotics at the time of catheter insertion has not been shown to reduce the incidence of catheter-related infection 21,22 and is strongly discouraged by the 2002 Guideline of the Hospital Infection Control Policy Advisory Committee of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 23 the prophylactic use of a vancomycin-containing lock solution, instilled into the catheter lumen to eradicate intralumi-nal contaminants, has been shown to reduce the incidence of CRBSI in adults 24 and older children 25 with cuffed and tunneled central venous catheters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Late-onset BSIs are more likely to be acquired from the hospital environment. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), Candida species, and Gram-negative bacteria (e.g., E. coli, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, and Serratia species) are typical pathogens; prematurity, low birth weight, central venous catheters, mechanical ventilation, parenteral nutrition and a long hospital stay have been reported as risk factors for late-onset BSIs [10,11,[79][80][81].…”
Section: Bloodstream Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without stratification, the heterogeneity of the study population could render comparisons between units, or over time in a single unit, invalid or misleading. For example, stratification by birth weight categories is recommended for NICU patients, because low birth weight has proved to be a significant risk factor for HAIs [10,11,64,74,76,79,80,194].…”
Section: Purpose and Objectives Of Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%