2022
DOI: 10.5624/isd.20220401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for external root resorption of maxillary second molars associated with third molars

Abstract: Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of panoramic images compared to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging for maxillary third molar (M3)-associated external root resorption (ERR), and to identify the risk factors of ERR on panoramic images. Materials and Methods The study population was composed of all patients who underwent panoramic imaging at Dankook University Dental Hospital from May to October 2019. In total, 397 cases of maxilla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the nature of the study, it is exceedingly challenging to avoid this bias. We discovered that at least one radiographically discernible lesion was connected to nearly half of the impacted mandibular third teeth that were examined [13][14][15]. This result disagrees with several other studies but is generally consistent with other others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Due to the nature of the study, it is exceedingly challenging to avoid this bias. We discovered that at least one radiographically discernible lesion was connected to nearly half of the impacted mandibular third teeth that were examined [13][14][15]. This result disagrees with several other studies but is generally consistent with other others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Signi cant efforts have been devoted to identifying the speci c type of M3 that may lead to ERR. Previous studies have primarily focused on potential risk factors for ERR, while it was possible to predict that M3 with these risk factors presented a higher likelihood of causing ERR [12,19], such predictions inherently involved multiple variables. However, in practical terms, due to the inability to ascertain the precise probability of M2-ERR, patients and dentists continue to have di culty in making decisions regarding whether M3 should be extracted based on existing risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on case reports and retrospective studies, numerous risk factors have been linked to ERR. These include sex, age, type of impaction, inclination of M3, and others [9][10][11][12]. Despite extensive exploration of numerous risk factors, further research is still necessary to determine if there are any other factors that may be correlated with ERR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is most available data from case reports about the root resorption of second molars as a complication of impacted third molars. 8,9,10 The published data have shown that the position and angulation of third molars affect symptoms and pathological eects associated with impacted third molar. 11,12 A relationship between the width of the peri-coronal space and the presence of an epithelial lining associated with an impacted tooth has been previously reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%