2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors for Glaucoma Drainage Device Revision or Removal Using the IRIS Registry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to prior studies, they found Caucasian race to have a higher risk of experiencing a sooner second re‐exposure of GDD 100 . While in the retrospective cohort study of 44 330 patients by Hall et al, Black race was not associated with a higher risk of revision or removal of GDD in the multivariable models 101 …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to prior studies, they found Caucasian race to have a higher risk of experiencing a sooner second re‐exposure of GDD 100 . While in the retrospective cohort study of 44 330 patients by Hall et al, Black race was not associated with a higher risk of revision or removal of GDD in the multivariable models 101 …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…100 While in the retrospective cohort study of 44 330 patients by Hall et al, Black race was not associated with a higher risk of revision or removal of GDD in the multivariable models. 101 Although less attended to, sociodemographic disparities are also present in glaucoma clinical trials access and representation. The cross-sectional study by Soares et al reported worse access to ophthalmology clinical trial sites for patients living in rural areas or of lower income and education level.…”
Section: Access To Surgery and Surgical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shows that the initial result was driven mainly by this study due to the larger weight it contributes to the overall metaanalysis. That being said, it should be recognized that many factors contribute to the risk of revision surgery following glaucoma management (i.e., dry eye disease, chronic glaucoma, previous eye procedures) 35 , and in our analysis, we are not certain that these factors were balanced across studied interventions to re ect a real increase in the risk of revision surgery in the CP/PCP group. Therefore, we recommend future studies to put these factors into consideration when designing their studies or analysis based on previously collected data (through propensity-score matching) to be able to reach more valid and reliable evidence.…”
Section: Pcp] Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…While the size of this database is a major asset, it does not include nonophthalmic data, visual field, optic disc photographs, or optical coherence tomography (OCT) data. IRIS has been used in many studies investigating real-world patterns and outcomes for glaucoma care, such as investigation on Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery utilization, variation in practice between academic and nonacademic settings, and risk factors for drainage device revision or removal 3–6 . Currently, access to IRIS is limited to academic medical centers of the IRIS Registry Analytic Center Consortium; some research awards, for example, through the American Glaucoma Society, also enable access to the IRIS registry.…”
Section: Big Data/data Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%