2014
DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000000389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors for Loss of Ipsilateral Residual Hearing After Hybrid Cochlear Implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
40
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
40
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Age at implantation and duration of high frequency hearing loss have a negative effect on performance. In addition, a history of noise exposure and male gender also has a negative impact on performance with the implant 31 . When this research was initiated, some of these demographic features were important in standard cochlear implant patient counseling, however, it was not appreciated that similar factors would impact the Hybrid implant subjects as they had residual hearing 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age at implantation and duration of high frequency hearing loss have a negative effect on performance. In addition, a history of noise exposure and male gender also has a negative impact on performance with the implant 31 . When this research was initiated, some of these demographic features were important in standard cochlear implant patient counseling, however, it was not appreciated that similar factors would impact the Hybrid implant subjects as they had residual hearing 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we extrapolate from the FDA S8 trial and accept the prevalence of late acceleration of hearing loss in hearing preservation implantees as 20%, we can estimate the relative risk of late hearing loss as roughly three times higher in those exposed to high charge relative to those who are not exposed. This univariate analysis may be confounded by additional variables, such as implant type, materials or patient health status – which our dataset does not address 17 . Finally, intracochlear pathologies (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon, referred to as bimodal benefit or electricacoustic stimulation (EAS) benefit, has received considerable attention in recent years as a possible alternative to traditional cochlear implantation. Bimodal hearing is most often configured with a cochlear implant in one ear and a hearing aid on the opposite ear; however, recent improvements in surgical techniques also allow for the use of residual hearing in the implanted ear in some patients (e.g., Lenarz et al, 2013;Kopelovich et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%