2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for particulate and microbial contamination of air in operating theatres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
108
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
11
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has been studied as an indicator of hospital contamination (Scaltriti et al, 2007). ANOVA was also applied to test whether patient infection was statistically significant with indoor biocontamination.…”
Section: Microbial Isolation and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been studied as an indicator of hospital contamination (Scaltriti et al, 2007). ANOVA was also applied to test whether patient infection was statistically significant with indoor biocontamination.…”
Section: Microbial Isolation and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, few data about the air quality in hospitals in developing and transition countries where factors such as hospital design, deficiency or improper control of high efficiency filtration systems and overcrowding can impact on the presence and concentration of airborne microorganisms. In addition, routine air biomonitoring of hospitals is time-consuming, labour intensive and is valid only for the moment and location of collection [9]. It has been suggested that particle counting could be used as a faster and simpler alternative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that particle counting could be used as a faster and simpler alternative. However, its value in the prediction of airborne bacteria in various parts of hospital environments has rarely been investigated [7,9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of ACH to remove hazardous substances below those of exposure standards was highlighted by Scott, Beswick, and Wakefield (2004) using 20 ACH. Other studies have identified the removal of particulate matter and surgical smoke at rates greater than 15 ACH (Scaltriti et al, 2007;Wan, Chung, & Tang, 2011). Scott et al (2004) noted that previous studies might have detected chemical substances because the ACH rates were lower than 20 during testing.…”
Section: Control Of Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different tissues elicited different compounds with several respiratory irritants identified, but with lower exposure limits than OSHA standards Scaltriti, et al 2007 Air quality was measured during 23 surgical procedures with and ACH of 15.…”
Section: Cautery Co2 Lasermentioning
confidence: 99%