2003
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.138.3.314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors for Postoperative Infectious Complications in Noncolorectal Abdominal Surgery

Abstract: Hypothesis: Infectious complications are the main causes of postoperative morbidity in abdominal surgery. Identification of risk factors, which could be avoided in the perioperative period, may reduce the rate of postoperative infectious complications.Design: A database was established from 3 prospective, randomized, multicenter studies. Multivariate analysis was performed using nonconditional logistic regression expressed as an odds ratio (OR).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
45
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This incidence of postoperative infections is closer to what observed in clean minor surgery 32,33 than after major GI operations. Our rate of infections is in line with other recent experiences 34,35 and anyway might be explained by the fact that we followed patients for 30-days postdischarge and this may intercept a large proportion of complications which were not clinically evident during the 10 days of hospitalization. Moreover, the patients included in those analyses were often nonhomogeneous for primary disease (cancer and benign disease together), types of surgery (vascular, abdominal, uro-genital), and baseline nutritional status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This incidence of postoperative infections is closer to what observed in clean minor surgery 32,33 than after major GI operations. Our rate of infections is in line with other recent experiences 34,35 and anyway might be explained by the fact that we followed patients for 30-days postdischarge and this may intercept a large proportion of complications which were not clinically evident during the 10 days of hospitalization. Moreover, the patients included in those analyses were often nonhomogeneous for primary disease (cancer and benign disease together), types of surgery (vascular, abdominal, uro-genital), and baseline nutritional status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The first important result of this current study is the significantly increased overall complication rate in the patient group with routine drainage that is caused by [21,29]. Thus, the only proven advantage of the laparoscopic versus the open approach, i.e., the reduced wound infection rate, gambled away by routinely inserted drains [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Nevertheless, the role of this practice remains an ongoing matter of debate [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Routine drainage of the abdominal cavity after various types of surgical interventions has been a robust dogma in abdominal surgery for many decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[51,52] Specifically, Cruse and Foord documented that the risk of postoperative infection doubles with each additional hour of surgery. [53,54] Furthermore, the prevalence of postoperative infections increases significantly with duration of the surgical procedure: 6.3% for 1 hour, 12.2% for 1 to 2 hour, and 27.7% for >2 hour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%