2015
DOI: 10.1017/ice.2015.76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors for Recurrent Colonization With Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusin Community-Dwelling Adults and Children

Abstract: OBJECTIVE To identify risk factors for recurrent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization. DESIGN Prospective cohort study conducted from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2012. SETTING Five adult and pediatric academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS Subjects (ie, index cases) who presented with acute community-onset MRSA skin and soft-tissue infection. METHODS Index cases and all household members performed self-sampling for MRSA colonization every 2 weeks for 6 months. Clearance of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatment of the initial MRSA SSTI with clindamycin was significantly associated with decreased risk of persistent MRSA colonisation. We found the same association between clindamycin and earlier clearance of MRSA colonisation [9] as well as decreased risk of recurrent MRSA colonisation [15]. One small study noted that patients with staphylococcal skin infections treated with clindamycin for 3 months resulted in recurrent abscesses in 2 of 11 patients as compared with 7 of 11 patients who received placebo [29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Treatment of the initial MRSA SSTI with clindamycin was significantly associated with decreased risk of persistent MRSA colonisation. We found the same association between clindamycin and earlier clearance of MRSA colonisation [9] as well as decreased risk of recurrent MRSA colonisation [15]. One small study noted that patients with staphylococcal skin infections treated with clindamycin for 3 months resulted in recurrent abscesses in 2 of 11 patients as compared with 7 of 11 patients who received placebo [29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The scenario described in this report represents one explanation for observed failure of household-wide decolonization protocols to eradicate S. aureus carriage from index cases (Fritz et al 2012; Cluzet et al 2015a) and is unique in that it neither implicates the home environment nor the pet dog in re-colonization of the index patient following successful treatment. While future case assessments and research studies should include multiple evaluations of home environmental contamination and companion animal carriage over time to capture the potentially dynamic nature of intra-household transmission, attention to community sources outside the home may be necessary to understand drivers of recurrent colonization or infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The household, which consisted of the index patient and a white female household member in her 30s, enrolled in the Epidemiology and Prevention of MRSA Transmission in the Community trial (NCT00966446) in July 2012 (Cluzet et al 2015a; Cluzet et al 2015b). Four weeks after the index patient’s MRSA SSTI diagnosis, the two people in the household were randomized at the baseline study visit to receive one week of twice-daily nasal mupirocin treatment and two body washes with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (Hibiclens®, Mölnlycke Health Care, Norcross, Georgia).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around 20 % of MRSA-infected patients never clear their colonization, and older age has been reported to be associated with longer duration of MRSA colonization [2]. Early caloric negative-energy balance is an independent determinant of MRSA colonization and of late-onset infection in mechanically ventilated patients.…”
Section: Early Recognition Of Multiresistant-bacteria Carriersmentioning
confidence: 98%