2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2646-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated adults in Peru: a multicenter observational study

Abstract: BackgroundClinical and epidemiological differences between acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that presents at the initiation of mechanical ventilation [MV] (ARDS at MV onset) and that which develops during the course of MV (ARDS after MV onset) are not well understood. We conducted an observational study in five Peruvian ICUs to characterize differences between ARDS at MV onset and after MV onset and identify risk factors for the development of ARDS after MV onset.MethodsWe consecutively enrolled crit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7 The proportion of patients with LIPS ³ 4 who developed ARDS during follow-up, however, was less than that reported in previous studies in high-income settings (7-9%) 7,27 and also compared with a recent investigation focusing on the development of ARDS in patients in Peruvian ICUs (11%). 28 The current study confirms the poor predictive value of the LIPS for developing ARDS 7 and for pulmonary complications, however, did identify patients at increased risk of death. The higher mortality in the group with LIPS ³ 4 may be explained, at least in part by differences in age, Body mass index and comorbidities, the SOFA score on admission, and use of noninvasive ventilation before the start of invasive ventilation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7 The proportion of patients with LIPS ³ 4 who developed ARDS during follow-up, however, was less than that reported in previous studies in high-income settings (7-9%) 7,27 and also compared with a recent investigation focusing on the development of ARDS in patients in Peruvian ICUs (11%). 28 The current study confirms the poor predictive value of the LIPS for developing ARDS 7 and for pulmonary complications, however, did identify patients at increased risk of death. The higher mortality in the group with LIPS ³ 4 may be explained, at least in part by differences in age, Body mass index and comorbidities, the SOFA score on admission, and use of noninvasive ventilation before the start of invasive ventilation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…22 [18,28] 21.0 [18,25] 22 [18,28] 28 [23,36] 0.0009 < 0.0001 Pplat (cmH 2 O) † 18 [15,21] 16 [14,18] 18 [16,21] 28 [22,30] < 0.0001 < 0.0001 Driving pressure (cmH 2 O) 14 [11,18] 13 [10,17] 15 [11,18] 16 [14,20] 0.0705 0.0037 Set RR (bpm)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our multivariate regression analysis was adjusted for severity of disease by including the SOFA score, for predisposing characteristics by including age, BMI, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic cardiac disease, and for procalcitonin levels on admission based on our own preliminary findings and other literature [ 8 11 , 13 , 27 29 ]. Besides a procalcitonin level of >0.1 ng/ml, duration of mechanical ventilation was associated with age and BMI in our multivariate regression model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study from Canada, less than half of patients received a V T ≤ 8 ml/kg PBW [ 49 ]. In one study from Peru, only a fraction of patients received ventilation with a V T of ≤ 6 ml/kg PBW [ 44 ]. In studies in patients with acute respiratory failure related to COVID-19, median V T varied from 5.8 to 7.0 ml/kg PBW––mean V T was ~7 ml/kg PBW in one study from the United Kingdom [ 51 ] ( Table 2 and Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%