1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30363-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors for Transmission and Methods for Control of Caprine Arthritis-Encephalitis Virus Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
1
28

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
75
1
28
Order By: Relevance
“…As indicated before, the veterinarian responsible for the intensively raised flocks had expressed concern for MVV-infection and the contrary was the case for the veterinarian looking after the extensive flocks and this could be a source of strong selection bias. However, similarly high SRLV-seroprevalence is typical for example in intensive dairy goat herds in California [28] and in Icelandic sheep kept in close confinement in the winter [20] and similar low and null SRLV-seroprevalence was reported in extensive flocks in Patagonia [25,26]. Further bias might have been introduced by selecting the smaller flocks in the extensive system and those registered with the local milk-board among intensive flocks, but it is unlikely that either factor contributes greatly to explaining the enormous differences in MVV-seroprevalence in these two sheep production systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated before, the veterinarian responsible for the intensively raised flocks had expressed concern for MVV-infection and the contrary was the case for the veterinarian looking after the extensive flocks and this could be a source of strong selection bias. However, similarly high SRLV-seroprevalence is typical for example in intensive dairy goat herds in California [28] and in Icelandic sheep kept in close confinement in the winter [20] and similar low and null SRLV-seroprevalence was reported in extensive flocks in Patagonia [25,26]. Further bias might have been introduced by selecting the smaller flocks in the extensive system and those registered with the local milk-board among intensive flocks, but it is unlikely that either factor contributes greatly to explaining the enormous differences in MVV-seroprevalence in these two sheep production systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that some SRLV subtypes have been isolated from both sheep and goats furthermore indicates that interspecies transmission must have occurred at least once in each of these subtypes, although the frequency and direction of transmission remain unknown (12,21,22,32). While interspecies transmission from goats to sheep under natural conditions has never been observed (1,16,23,27), we have recently forwarded statistical evidence suggesting that transmission of the newly discovered SRLV subtype A4 from sheep to goats must occur regularly, though rarely (26).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, they may be related to the analytical sensitivity of the diagnostic test used (KLEIN et al, 1985;EAST, 1997;ANDRÉS et al, 2005), host genetic factors, differences between sheep and goats in the stimulus of the humoral response to either some antigens or the same viral strain (FLURI et al, 2006;RACHID et al, 2013), and SRLV genotype, which influences the rates of viral replication, in which the animals infected with more virulent samples have earlier and higher titers (KAJIKAWA; LAIRMORE; DEMARTINI, 1990;RIMSTAD et al, 1993).…”
Section: Seroconversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This antibody titer is reduced after 2-3 months of age. For this reason, serological test should only be recommended after this period (ROWE et al, 1992a). However, virus transmission also by the colostrum, whereby passive antibodies are transmitted to goats, is a relevant possibility to consider (GOUVEIA, 2012).…”
Section: Agarose Gel Immunodiffusion (Agid)mentioning
confidence: 99%