2015
DOI: 10.1111/sms.12505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors of hand climbing‐related injuries

Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the protective mechanisms or risk factors that can be related to the occurrence of hand climbing-related injuries (CRIH ). CRIH (tendon, pulley, muscle, and joint injuries) were retrospectively screened in 528 adult climbers. The questionnaire contained anthropometric items (e.g., body mass index - BMI), as well as items regarding climbing and basic training activities (warm-up, cool-down and session durations, number of session per week, hydration, practice level, climbing surf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature on physiological demands in climbing and the risks for injury is growing 6–11. However, studies reporting BMI and risk for injuries in climbing do not distinguish between acute and chronic injuries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on physiological demands in climbing and the risks for injury is growing 6–11. However, studies reporting BMI and risk for injuries in climbing do not distinguish between acute and chronic injuries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,25 This together with methodological differences may explain why our results seem high compared with those of previous studies. 3,5,23 Injury prevention programs in sports, targeting neuromuscular training and its subsets, such as strength training, have been shown to be effective in various sports. 18,21 Strength training has been hypothesized to prevent injuries by strengthening adjacent tissues and thus reducing critical joint loads in addition to muscle strength improvements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,25 This together with methodological differences may explain why our results seem high compared with those of previous studies. 3,5,23…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations