“…Another issue is the lack of a uniform and accepted definition of pure long‐term follow up, further complicating outcome analysis. Studies include a wide range of follow‐up (i.e., 1 to 15 years), rather than an agreed upon minimum number of years, say 10 39 , 42‐43 , 46 , 50‐56 . Lawrie, for example, followed consecutively operated upon patients for over 10 years, 57 while others had follow‐ups between 1 months and 16.6 years 52 , 55 …”