2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.31.20162875
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors of severity in community-acquired staphylococcal pneumonia

Abstract: Background Staphylococcus aureus causes severe forms of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), namely staphylococcal pleuropneumonia in young children and staphylococcal necrotizing pneumonia in older patients. Methicillin resistance and the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) toxin have both been associated with poor outcome in severe CAP, but their respective roles are unclear. Methods Prospective multicenter cohort study of severe staphylococcal CAP conducted in 77 pediatric and adult intensive care units in Fra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 The genotypic analysis demonstrated a significant clonal diversity, with a 62% rate of toxin genes, similarly to colonizing and pathogenic S. aureus strains. 15 While the PVL strains may be involved in necrotizing community-acquired pneumonia, 13 the 2 ACS episodes were not associated with necrotizing pulmonary lesions, and had favorable outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5 The genotypic analysis demonstrated a significant clonal diversity, with a 62% rate of toxin genes, similarly to colonizing and pathogenic S. aureus strains. 15 While the PVL strains may be involved in necrotizing community-acquired pneumonia, 13 the 2 ACS episodes were not associated with necrotizing pulmonary lesions, and had favorable outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, antibiotic therapy targeting MSSA on admission of patients with ACS having a prior S. aureus infection may be warranted. 10) 2 ( 10) 2 ( 10) 2 (10) 1 (5) 1 (5) 1 (5) 1 (5) 1 (5) 1 (5) 1 (5) 1 (5) Table 2 [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] 3 [3][4] 16 [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] 3 [3][4] 0.31 0.47…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation