2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk for eating disorders modulates interpretation bias in a semantic priming task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, implicit biases were predictive of eating disorder (ED)-related symptomatology above and beyond the corresponding explicit biases [ 22 ]. Finally, in females with self-reported ED-traits, symptoms regarding body dissatisfaction were consistently associated with both explicit [ 23 ] and implicit [ 24 ] negative biases to food.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, implicit biases were predictive of eating disorder (ED)-related symptomatology above and beyond the corresponding explicit biases [ 22 ]. Finally, in females with self-reported ED-traits, symptoms regarding body dissatisfaction were consistently associated with both explicit [ 23 ] and implicit [ 24 ] negative biases to food.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten studies used the SC-IAT, whereas three studies tested participants both with the two-categories IAT and the SC-IAT ( Friese et al , 2008 ; Houben et al , 2010 ; Guidetti et al , 2012 ). Five studies used the AP task, one the semantic priming task ( Misener and Libben, 2017 ), three the AMP ( Ellis et al , 2014 ; Woodward and Treat, 2015 ; Woodward et al , 2017 ) and two the EAST or similar variants ( Hoefling and Strack, 2008 ; Veenstra and de Jong, 2010 ). Four studies combined more than one task, to investigate the role of different implicit measures in predicting behaviour ( Roefs et al , 2005a ; Conner et al , 2007 ; Seibt et al , 2007 ; Genschow et al , 2017 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies investigated the relationship between implicit food preferences and individual variables ( Pechey et al , 2015 ; Sato et al , 2016 ; Werntz et al , 2016 ; Misener and Libben, 2017 ). Sato et al (2016) showed significant AP effect in evaluating faces subliminally primed by food or mosaic images, with no differences between high-fat and low-fat food and reported that this effect correlated with individual external eating.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such effects can be subconscious or subliminal and deliberately introduced in formal paradigms (Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001;Maier, Berner, & Pekrun, 2003;Ramscar, 2016). They can also result from specific demand characteristics in a given situation (D'Souza, Booth, Connolly, Happé, & Karmiloff-Smith, 2015), from an individual's interpretation of what she or he has perceived (Misener & Libben, 2017), or from language used in the context of a query about a remembered event (Loftus, 2005). Given this, style of processing may not be a unidirectional process -in the sense of a skill or talent one has and consciously applies to some external problem or task in the world -but rather one that is elicited dynamically from interaction with the environment.…”
Section: Reflections On the Style Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%