2023
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12227086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk for Esophageal Cancer Based on Lifestyle Factors–Smoking, Alcohol Consumption, and Body Mass Index: Insight from a South Korean Population Study in a Low-Incidence Area

Mi Jung Kwon,
Ho Suk Kang,
Hyo Geun Choi
et al.

Abstract: Esophageal cancer constitutes a global public health challenge. However, South Korean population-specific information on the association of lifestyle (smoking, alcohol consumption, and obesity status) with esophageal cancer risk is sparse. This nested case–control study analyzed the Korean national health screening cohort data (2002–2019) of 1114 patients with esophageal cancer and 4456 controls (1:4 propensity-score matched for sex, age, income, and residential region). Conditional and unconditional logistic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Residential areas were initially sorted into 16 groups based on administrative districts, but were later consolidated into urban areas, including the seven largest Korean cities, while the rest were designated as rural. Similar categorization methods were applied to three variables [ 20 , 21 ]: tobacco smoking (nonsmoker, past smoker, or current smoker); alcohol consumption (<1 time a week, ≥1 time a week); and body mass index (BMI, kg/m 2 ), which was categorized as underweight (<18.5), normal weight (≥18.5 to <23), overweight (≥23 to <25), obese I (≥25 to <30), or obese II (≥30) [ 22 ]. The study also included health data like systolic and diastolic blood pressures (mmHg), fasting blood glucose levels (mg/dL), and total cholesterol levels (mg/dL) [ 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residential areas were initially sorted into 16 groups based on administrative districts, but were later consolidated into urban areas, including the seven largest Korean cities, while the rest were designated as rural. Similar categorization methods were applied to three variables [ 20 , 21 ]: tobacco smoking (nonsmoker, past smoker, or current smoker); alcohol consumption (<1 time a week, ≥1 time a week); and body mass index (BMI, kg/m 2 ), which was categorized as underweight (<18.5), normal weight (≥18.5 to <23), overweight (≥23 to <25), obese I (≥25 to <30), or obese II (≥30) [ 22 ]. The study also included health data like systolic and diastolic blood pressures (mmHg), fasting blood glucose levels (mg/dL), and total cholesterol levels (mg/dL) [ 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residential areas of the participants were categorized as either urban or rural, employing the same methodology as in previous studies. Furthermore, this study utilized a categorization approach consistent with that used in previous research for three variables: smoking, alcohol consumption, and obesity [24]. Obesity was determined on the basis of participants' BMI in kg/m 2 .…”
Section: Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were then categorized into five income brackets and classified based on their habitation areas into either urban areas, representing the seven largest cities in Korea, or rural areas, encompassing the remaining regions. Similar categorization was applied to tobacco use (non-smoker, former smoker, current smoker), alcohol consumption (<1 time per week, ≥1 time per week), and body mass index (BMI, kg/m 2 ) [35,36], with BMI categories including underweight (<18.5), normal weight (≥18.5 to <23), overweight (≥23 to <25), obese I (≥25 to <30), and obese II (≥30) [37]. Health data such as blood pressure measurements, fasting blood glucose levels, and total cholesterol levels were recorded.…”
Section: Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%