Objective: To review the diagnostic evolution andpredictive variables ofdiagnosis and outcome infirst-episode psychosis in adolescents (age 13-19 years) and adults.Method: Literature was reviewed through MEDLlNE, Psycinfo, and PubMed, and istorically, all presentations of childhood psychosis were grouped with schizophrenia, despite Kraepelin's original distinction between schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder. With the advent of Kolvin's work (1) and the subsequent DSM-III (2), childhood schizophrenia, autism, and other childhood psychoses came to be regarded as separate entities, thus creating diagnostic challenges (3-8). In addition to substance use and the emotional instability intrinsic to adolescence, the nonspecific presentation of adolescent (age 13-19 years) first-episode psychosis (FEP) contributes to this diagnostic dilemma (5,8,9; reviewed in 4,7,10,11).The frequency ofpsychosis increases with age in adolescence (8), with 0.5% of the population developing psychotic symptoms, mostly in the 16-to-19-year-old age group (12). The manifestations of psychosis are influenced by emotional, social, and cognitive developmental processes (13), which are still developing in adolescents. Psychosis onset in adolescence can significantly affect personal development (14-16) and has been suggested to represent a vulnerability in which brain-maturation processes facilitate the development of'psychotic symptoms (17). It has been postulated that with a later onset of psychosis, there is lower probability for such a facilitating process to be present, and therefore the chances ofrecovery from an acute episode are better (16).In light ofthe general impact of psychosis on adolescents and the diagnostic dilemma of adolescent FEP, this review attempts to understand better the course and outcome of psychotic disorders by comparing the adolescent and adult literature. This review addresses 2 questions: Is the diagnosis of FEP more stable in adults than in adolescents? Are there variables that can predict the course ofdiagnosis and outcome over time?
MethodWe searched MEDLINE, Psycinfo, and PubMed for literature from 1989 to 1999 using the following terms: adolescence, psychotic disorder, psychosis.first episode, diagnosis, diagnostic stability, follow-up studies, prognosis, risk factors. The key references of the selected articles were also reviewed, including pertinent articles published before 1989. Studies were selected if they met the following inclusion criteria: published in English, inclusion ofFEP data, subjects 13 years and older, and measurement ofvariables related to diagnosis or outcome over time. Studies with 1 diagnosis only, with no consideration to evolution of other diagnoses, were excluded. Notably, the literature contains an extensive array of studies that examine specific variables (such as age of onset, sex, IQ, medication, and neuroimaging) in psychotic