Risk governance and bank risk-taking behavior: Evidence from Asian banks

Abid, Ammar; Gull, Ammar Ali; Hussain, N.; Nguyen, Duc Khuong

doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101466

Cited by 47 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 75 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(2012) and Aljughaiman and Salama (2019) also find the important role of the CFO and risk committee in constraining bank risk-taking. Abid et al. (2021) and Nguyen (2022a) provide evidence that risk governance plays an important role in controlling bank risk.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of risk governance structure on bank risk management effectiveness: evidence from ASEAN countries

Nguyen

Dang

2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of risk governance structure on bank risk management effectiveness: evidence from ASEAN countries

Nguyen

Dang

2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Finally, we follow prior studies (Abid et al, 2021; Gull et al, 2018; Gull, Atif, et al, 2021; Nadarajah et al, 2021; Nekhili et al, 2020; Shahab et al, 2021; Wintoki et al, 2012) and use the GMM regression to control for unobserved heterogeneity, simultaneity, and the dynamic relationship between environmental performance and firm performance. We also report the Arellano‐Bond test for AR(1), the Arellano‐Bond test for AR(2) in first differences, and the Hansen test for over‐identification to ensure the accuracy of the GMM regressions.…”

Section: Empirical Results and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Revisiting the association between environmental performance and financial performance: Does the level of environmental orientation matter?

Gull

Saeed²,

Suleman

et al. 2022

Corp Soc Responsibility Env

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, we re-examine the nexus of environmental performance and financial performance by benchmarking firms relative to their industry peers based on environmental performance in a given year to identify best-in-class and worst-in-class firms. After correcting for distributional issues while using environmental performance scores (i.e., clustering scores around the median and material differences within industries and time) and financial performance ratios (i.e., the potential impact of extreme values), we find that best-in-class firms exhibit higher financial performance than their industry peers (i.e., worst-in-class and average firms). Our findings are robust to alternative measures of environmental performance (i.e., subdimensions of environmental performance) and financial performance. Finally, our results are robust to different identification strategies. Our findings present important and timely policy implications for firms, ESG fund managers and investors.

show abstract

“…In other words, achieving the company goal will be easier if the possible obstacles are known beforehand. Companies that implement risk management properly will be able to handle various adverse possibilities in their company and improve its performance (Abid et al, 2021). This can minimize the possibility of loss, and the company's existence can be maintained (Durst & Zieba, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The use ISO 31000:2018 in Indonesian Fintech Lending Companies: What Can We Learn?

Alijoyo

2022

JBMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Enterprise risk management (ERM) is significant in running a company. ISO 31000 is one of the ERM types that are familiar. However, there are still pros and cons of ISO 31000. Thus, this study aimed to find out the responses of the Indonesian fintech lending companies managements in implementing ISO 31000. Specifically, this study tried to identify the problems in implementing ISO 31000:2018 to be implemented as ERM. Besides, it also discussed the benefits of the ISO 31000:2018 implementation from the companies' management's perspectives. The data were collected through questionnaires and interviews. The questionnaire results were quantified and interpreted in percentage, while the interview results were analyzed qualitatively using the interactive data analysis method. The study results showed that most of the companies' management believed that they had no significant problems implementing ISO 31000:2018. In addition, they felt that implementing ISO 31000:2018 as ERM gave many benefits in running the companies. The study's findings were discussed by connecting them with the current theories and empirical reviews. However, since the study was done qualitatively, a further study that involves quantitative study to measure the effectiveness of ISO 31000 empirically is needed to support the results of this study.

show abstract

Risk governance and bank risk-taking behavior: Evidence from Asian banks

Cited by 47 publications

References 75 publications

The impact of risk governance structure on bank risk management effectiveness: evidence from ASEAN countries

The impact of risk governance structure on bank risk management effectiveness: evidence from ASEAN countries

Revisiting the association between environmental performance and financial performance: Does the level of environmental orientation matter?

The use ISO 31000:2018 in Indonesian Fintech Lending Companies: What Can We Learn?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About