1985
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-70385-0_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Groups in a Multicenter Pilot Study for Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic and Acute Undifferentiated Leukemia in Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
106
1
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
6
106
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results confirm that age is a major prognostic factor in ALL and that prognosis is poor in elderly ALL patients, both when achievement of CR and overall survival are considered (Bassan et al, 1996;Delannoy et al, 1990;Ferrari et al, 1995;Hoelzer et al, 1988;Gaynor et al, 1988;Hussein et al, 1989;Kantarjian et al, 1994;Taylor et al, 1992). In these studies the percentage of CR ranged from 11% to 65% (43% in our study), and the median survival ranged from 1 to 10 months (12 months in our study) (Table IV).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Our results confirm that age is a major prognostic factor in ALL and that prognosis is poor in elderly ALL patients, both when achievement of CR and overall survival are considered (Bassan et al, 1996;Delannoy et al, 1990;Ferrari et al, 1995;Hoelzer et al, 1988;Gaynor et al, 1988;Hussein et al, 1989;Kantarjian et al, 1994;Taylor et al, 1992). In these studies the percentage of CR ranged from 11% to 65% (43% in our study), and the median survival ranged from 1 to 10 months (12 months in our study) (Table IV).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…[1][2][3] Fewer than 50% of patients, however, are alive 5 years from diagnosis, with the majority of deaths being due to relapsed disease. 3,4 Survival following ALL relapse is dismal, 5 thus a key improvement in outcome may result from optimization of postremission consolidation therapy. Myeloablative conditioned (MAC) allo-SCT improves survival in patients in CR1 in both Ph-positive and negative disease, 6 due to a reduction in the relapse incidence (RI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disease risk stratification was based upon age, cytogenetics and the time taken to attain CR; 2 a modification of the classification proposed by Hoelzer et al 20 The following factors were analyzed in Cox proportionalhazards regression models: disease risk (standard versus intermediate versus high), gender, CR transplantation interval (o4 versus X4 months), type of induction therapy (UKALL X or similar versus UKALL XII or similar) and the leukocyte count at presentation (o30 versus X30 Â 10 9 /l). The effect of the intensity of maintenance therapy, in all 100 patients as well as only in the 86 alive and in CR 4 months after transplantation, was examined as follows: 0 versus 1 versus 2 versus 3 agents, and 0/1 agent versus 2/3 agents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven patients received marrow that was purged in vitro with Campath-1M. 20 The first seven blood stem cell recipients received G-CSF (filgrastim) at the dose of 125 mg/m 2 s.c. twice a day for 7 days, and underwent leukapheresis on days 5-8 (4 consecutive days). They also had back-up autologous marrow collected (which was not used).…”
Section: Induction Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%