Risk Management in End-to-End Global Supply Chain

Fan, Wenji; Gu, Jinyan; Tang, Hui; Gao, Xin

doi:10.1061/41186(421)376

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Competition and customer demands are constantly increasing and almost all industries face intense competition and globalization effects on business (Fan et al , 2011). To become more competitive, companies started to look at process integration, which is corroborated by authors such as Von Brocke (2014) and Kannengiesser et al (2016).…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, Shenoi et al (2018) highlight that SCRM must be an integral part of the supply chain. Companies and researchers are increasingly paying more attention to SCRM, which is notably triggered by the frequency and intensity of catastrophes, disasters and crises that are increasing on a global scale (Fan et al , 2011). Juttner (2003), Juttner (2005), Thun and Hoenig (2011) agree that the first stage concerning SCRM analysis is to visualize a supply chain as a set of cross-functional processes, therefore, avoiding local solutions that do not result in supply chain optimum.…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A systematic literature review on supply chain risk management: is healthcare management a forsaken research field?

Senna

Reis

Santos

et al. 2020

BIJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis paper aims to present a systematic literature review (SLR) to investigate how supply chain risk management (SCRM) is applied to the healthcare supply chains and which improvement opportunities are being missed in this segment.Design/methodology/approachThis SLR used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method to answer three research questions: (1) Which are the main gaps concerning healthcare supply chain risk management (HCSCRM)? (2) What is the definition of HCSCRM? and (3) What are the risk management techniques and approaches used in healthcare supply chains?FindingsThe authors present a complete summary of the HCSCRM body of research, investigating research strings like clinical engineering and high reliability organizations (HROs) and its relations with HCSCRM; (1) This research revealed the five pillars of HCSCRM; (2) The authors proposed a formal definition for HCSCRM considering all the literature blocks explored and (3) The authors generated a list of risks present in healthcare supply chains resulting from extensive article research.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors only reviewed international journal articles (published in the English language), excluding conference papers, dissertations and theses, textbooks, book chapters, unpublished articles and notes. In addition, the study did not thoroughly investigate specific countries' particularities concerning how the healthcare providers are organized.Originality/valueThe contribution of this article is threefold: (1) To the best of authors knowledge, there is no other SLR about HCSCRM published in the scientific literature by the time of realization of authors’ work, suggesting that is the first effort to fulfill this research gap; (2) Following the previous contribution, in this work the authors propose a first formal definition for HCSCRM and (3) The authors analyzed concepts such as clinical engineering and HROs to establish the building blocks of HCSCRM.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic literature review on supply chain risk management: is healthcare management a forsaken research field?

Senna

Reis

Santos

et al. 2020

BIJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Competition and customer demands are constantly increasing while almost all industries have witnessed fiercer competition and globalization effects on markets (Fan et al, 2011). The last two decades showed evolution concerning process integration (Kannengiesser et al, 2016).…”

Section: Supply Chain Risk Management (Scrm)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Healthcare supply chain risk assessment KPIs: an empirical study using PLS-SEM

Senna

Reis

Guimarães

et al. 2023

Prod.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Paper aims: This study has the objective of mapping and empirically validating KPIs that can be used to assess healthcare supply chain risks. Originality:We combined two methodological approaches: i) we conducted a systematic literature review to identify the healthcare supply chain risk assessment KPIs and ii) We grouped these KPIs into five constructs and validated their relations using PLS-SEM.Research method: This is the only study that presents a systematic literature review to identify KPIs that measure healthcare supply chain risks, groups the KPIs into a theoretical framework, and presents a PLS-SEM validation. This study used data from Brazil, from a variety of healthcare supply chain organizations (suppliers, OEMs, clinics, and hospitals), therefore we cannot guarantee that the study can be generalized. Main findings:The systematic literature review identified 27 KPIs which were grouped into five constructs. The structural model supported by the PLS-SEM technique revealed that reliability, responsiveness, costs, and agility are antecedents to healthcare supply chain quality.Implications for theory and practice: Managers may rely upon this study to understand that healthcare supply chain reliability and responsiveness are antecedents to healthcare supply chain costs and agility, which are antecedents to healthcare supply chain quality.

show abstract