Risk markers for physical intimate partner violence victimization: A meta-analysis

Spencer, Chelsea; Stith, Sandra M.; Cafferky, Bryan

doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.10.009

Cited by 108 publications

(130 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

112

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless, in the intimate terrorism or coercive control cases, those among which the author situates Jones , we often find violence that increases in frequency and/or severity; ongoing, violent, and extreme sexual jealousy; a sense from victims the abuser is capable of killing; beating during a pregnancy; use of a gun or other weapon against the victim; previous attempts to kill; prior strangulation, choking, or suffocation; intense attempts to control; forced sex; stalking and paranoid surveillance of routines; perpetrator depression and suicidal tendencies; alcohol and/or drug abuse. We also find evidence of chilling emotional abuse and intimidation without physical violence (see, for example, Campbell et al, 2003; Dobash & Dobash, 2015; Messing et al, 2015; Spencer et al, 2019; Websdale, 1999).…”

Section: Classifying the Ipv In Jonesmentioning

confidence: 54%

The Courts, Intimate Partner Violence and Mental Illness: The Case of Dwight Lamon Jones

Websdale

2020

Juvenile Family Court J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Through the lens of the high‐profile spree killing perpetrated by Dwight Lamon Jones in 2018 in Phoenix, Arizona, this article examines the way the criminal and civil courts grappled with assessing the significance, extent, and outcome of the IPV and abuse directed at Dr. Connie Jones, Dwight Jones’s former wife. The case is unusual, not least because Dr. Jones had an upper middle‐class income and numerous resources IPV victims do not normally enjoy. Nevertheless, she felt the courts let her family down. Journalists, victim advocates, and others also criticized the Arizona courts. The article outlines the spree killing and the criticisms of the courts, narrates Jones over a period of nine years including the IPV and mental illness, and, through the work of the Study Committee convened by Arizona Chief Justice Bales, explores the potential use of IPV risk assessments in the courts, particularly the family court, and related matters. It concludes with recommendations regarding possible preventive interventions in IPV cases, including those addressing mental illness.

show abstract

Section: Classifying the Ipv In Jonesmentioning

confidence: 54%

The Courts, Intimate Partner Violence and Mental Illness: The Case of Dwight Lamon Jones

Websdale

2020

Juvenile Family Court J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As has been found in many settings [ 7 , 30 – 32 ], women’s childhood experiences of abuse (witnessing violence against a household member, or experiencing physical and/or sexual abuse themselves) were strongly associated with both physical and sexual IPV. Social Learning Theory [ 33 ] has been widely applied to the study of the ‘intergenerational transmission’ of violence, and posits that children who witness IPV against their mothers learn to normalise IPV and are more likely to imitate or tolerate such behaviours in their own relationships.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 71%

Couples data from north-western Tanzania: Insights from a survey of male partners of women enrolled in the MAISHA cluster randomized trial of an intimate partner violence prevention intervention

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Globally, around 30% of ever-partnered women have experienced physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence (IPV) during their lifetime. To date, most research into causes and prevention of IPV involves surveys of women, with little research into risk-factors for male perpetration. This paper describes a survey of male partners of women participating in the MAISHA cluster randomised trial (CRT) of an IPV prevention intervention, in Mwanza City, Tanzania. Using linked couples' data, we explore man-, woman-, and relationship-/household-level factors associated with physical and sexual IPV. Methods Women were interviewed at baseline and 29-months follow-up. At follow-up, women were asked for consent to invite their partner to participate in the male survey. We describe response rates for the women's follow-up and male partners' surveys, and identify factors associated with women's consent to approach partners. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with women's past-year experiences of physical and sexual IPV. Results 512 (65%) partnered women consented for the partner to be approached, higher among intervention than control women. 425 (83%) male partners were interviewed. Women consenting were disproportionately likely to be in longer-term relationships. Past-year IPV was

show abstract

“…Future studies using different methods in measuring the variables and varied designs in evaluating the results of the measurements will increase the validity of the outcomes. From a different perspective, it is known that axis I and especially axis II cluster B disorders like anxiety, mood, alcohol and substance use disorders are risk factors for intimate partner violence experience (50). There are also findings showing that personality traits are individual risk factors that predict different violence groups (51).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation, Separation Anxiety and Impulsivity as Predictors of Women’s Intimate Partner Violence Experiences

Kayha¹

2019

Dusunen Adam

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Risk markers for physical intimate partner violence victimization: A meta-analysis

Cited by 108 publications

References 28 publications

The Courts, Intimate Partner Violence and Mental Illness: The Case of Dwight Lamon Jones

The Courts, Intimate Partner Violence and Mental Illness: The Case of Dwight Lamon Jones

Couples data from north-western Tanzania: Insights from a survey of male partners of women enrolled in the MAISHA cluster randomized trial of an intimate partner violence prevention intervention

The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation, Separation Anxiety and Impulsivity as Predictors of Women’s Intimate Partner Violence Experiences

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About