2020
DOI: 10.1137/19m1259134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Measures and Progressive Enlargement of Filtration: A BSDE Approach

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As emphasized by Kalkbrener (2005) in the static case, however, full allocation and no-undercut together with (X ; X ) = ρ(X ) are incompatible for convex risk measures that are not coherent since these axioms together imply subadditivity. Nevertheless, as underlined by Brunnermeier and Cheridito (2019), full allocation can be dropped when, e.g., the CAR is considered only for monitoring purposes [see also Canna et al (2020), Centrone and Rosazza Gianin (2018) and the references therein for a deeper discussion]. For the reason above, sub-allocation and weak convexity can be defined and investigated as alternatives to full allocation.…”
Section: Bsdes and Their Connection To Dynamic Risk Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As emphasized by Kalkbrener (2005) in the static case, however, full allocation and no-undercut together with (X ; X ) = ρ(X ) are incompatible for convex risk measures that are not coherent since these axioms together imply subadditivity. Nevertheless, as underlined by Brunnermeier and Cheridito (2019), full allocation can be dropped when, e.g., the CAR is considered only for monitoring purposes [see also Canna et al (2020), Centrone and Rosazza Gianin (2018) and the references therein for a deeper discussion]. For the reason above, sub-allocation and weak convexity can be defined and investigated as alternatives to full allocation.…”
Section: Bsdes and Their Connection To Dynamic Risk Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second and somehow related to the previous point, there is a huge literature on risk measures induced by BSDEs in a Brownian setting or in a setting with jumps. See, among others, Barrieu and El Karoui [2], Delbaen et al [17], Rosazza Gianin [33], Laeven and Stadje [26], Quenez and Sulem [31], Calvia and Rosazza Gianin [8]. Finally, some recent works (see Kromer and Overbeck [24,25] and Mabitsela et al [27]) already focus on dynamic risk measures induced by BSDEs and Volterra equations to investigate the gradient allocation.…”
Section: Dynamic Risk Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faidi, Matoussi and Mnif (2011) and Faidi, Matoussi and Mnif (2017) investigate the related stochastic control problem by relative entropy and φ-divergences. Laeven and Stadje (2014) and Calvia and Rosazza Gianin (2020) examine the dynamic risk measures and related BSDEs in the jump situation, and the readers can refer to Rosazza Gianin (2006), Jiang (2008) and Delbaen, Peng and Rosazza Gianin (2010) for the Brownian motion case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%