2018
DOI: 10.1080/1350486x.2018.1535275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk-Neutral Pricing and Hedging of In-Play Football Bets

Abstract: A risk-neutral valuation framework is developed for pricing and hedging in-play football bets based on modelling scores by independent Poisson processes with constant intensities. The Fundamental Theorems of Asset Pricing are applied to this set-up which enables us to derive novel arbitrage-free valuation formulae for contracts currently traded in the market. We also describe how to calibrate the model to the market and how trades can be replicated and hedged.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, econophysics has somewhat neglected a certain type of financial markets: Betting markets. This is perhaps surprising because economists, on the contrary, have studied betting markets extensively, considering them as a controlled experiment for market efficiency [10,11,12], a key concept in financial economics. Because the outcome of the bet -win or lose -is definitely known after a certain time, it is straightforward to draw conclusions from the discrepancy between the implied market odds 1 and the true winning probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, econophysics has somewhat neglected a certain type of financial markets: Betting markets. This is perhaps surprising because economists, on the contrary, have studied betting markets extensively, considering them as a controlled experiment for market efficiency [10,11,12], a key concept in financial economics. Because the outcome of the bet -win or lose -is definitely known after a certain time, it is straightforward to draw conclusions from the discrepancy between the implied market odds 1 and the true winning probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%