2018
DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of 12-month mortality among hospital inpatients using the surprise question and SPICT criteria: a prospective study

Abstract: The GSF-PIG approach identified a large minority of hospital inpatients who might benefit from advance care planning. Future studies are needed to investigate the feasibility, cost and impact of screening in hospitals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
24
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Effective communication of information is essential to implement patients' choices in end-of-life decisions. 30 The NHS Five year forward view recognises the collaboration and communication between HCPs. 31 To ensure this, emphasis was placed on detailed written documentation and, on occasion, telephone calls to primary care providers.…”
Section: Improve Communication Of Acp Discussion Between Primary Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective communication of information is essential to implement patients' choices in end-of-life decisions. 30 The NHS Five year forward view recognises the collaboration and communication between HCPs. 31 To ensure this, emphasis was placed on detailed written documentation and, on occasion, telephone calls to primary care providers.…”
Section: Improve Communication Of Acp Discussion Between Primary Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 conclusIon The CODE framework principles apply across a spectrum of ages and conditions but are most relevant to those with older age (>65 years), life-limiting illness and a 'no' response to the 'surprise question' ('Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?'). 17 Code status preference is frequently ignored, misunderstood or improperly documented, which represents a real patient safety issue resulting in preventable harm. Failures in CSDs can result from choice complexity, order entry errors, delayed discussion and lack of formalised training to conduct these difficult conversations.…”
Section: (E) Educate the Workforcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the harms of a false negative result (deny patients palliative care) outweigh the harms of a false positive result (possibly starting palliative care principles too early) [29,30], we value sensitivity more important than specificity. We aim at a sensitivity of more than 70%, a specificity of more than 50% and a AUC of ≥0.70.…”
Section: Goals Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%