2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of brain injury during diagnostic coronary angiography: Comparison between right and left radial approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7 In addition, catheter exchanges and manipulation within ascending aorta were shown to be associated with increased incidence of cerebral embolism. 28,29 Risk of cerebral embolism is especially valid for RRA route whereby manipulation in ascending aorta and brachiocephalic trunk exposes right common carotid artery to a higher risk of embolization compared to left radial or femoral routes, although most cerebral microembolisms are clinically silent and absolute risk of cerebrovascular event is low. 29,30 Therefore, single-catheter strategy might be more suited to right radial approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 In addition, catheter exchanges and manipulation within ascending aorta were shown to be associated with increased incidence of cerebral embolism. 28,29 Risk of cerebral embolism is especially valid for RRA route whereby manipulation in ascending aorta and brachiocephalic trunk exposes right common carotid artery to a higher risk of embolization compared to left radial or femoral routes, although most cerebral microembolisms are clinically silent and absolute risk of cerebrovascular event is low. 29,30 Therefore, single-catheter strategy might be more suited to right radial approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catheter exchanges also cause transient or permanent functional changes in radial and brachial arteries . In addition, catheter exchanges and manipulation within ascending aorta were shown to be associated with increased incidence of cerebral embolism . Risk of cerebral embolism is especially valid for RRA route whereby manipulation in ascending aorta and brachiocephalic trunk expose right common carotid artery to a higher risk of embolization compared to left radial or femoral routes, although most cerebral microembolisms are clinically silent and absolute risk of cerebrovascular event is very low .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk of cerebral embolism is especially valid for RRA route whereby manipulation in ascending aorta and brachiocephalic trunk expose right common carotid artery to a higher risk of embolization compared to left radial or femoral routes, although most cerebral microembolisms are clinically silent and absolute risk of cerebrovascular event is very low. 15,16 Therefore two-catheter strategy might be more suited to left radial approach whereas single-catheter strategy is preferable in right radial approach. However, left radial approach has a disadvantage of requiring different table set-up and logistics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catheter ablation for AF is associated with a considerable risk of SCEs/SCLs detected on magnetic resonance imaging, as reported for RF ablation but recently also for CB‐A ablation . Real‐time monitoring of microembolic signals (MESs) in the cerebral arteries by transcranial doppler, as a surrogate for microembolization, have been described in other clinical settings than AF ablation, supporting the association with a risk of silent strokes . A recent study investigated the detection of MESs during the various procedural steps of CB‐A ablation .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%