1988
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1988.172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of breast cancer in relation to reproductive factors in Denmark

Abstract: SummaryThe effect of reproductive factors on breast cancer risk was evaluated in a population-based casecontrol study, including 1,486 breast cancer cases diagnosed over a one-year period in Denmark. They were identified from the files of the nationwide trial of the Danish Breast Cancer Co-operative group and the Danish Cancer Registry. The control group was an age-stratified random sample of 1,336 women from the general population. Data on risk factors were collected by self-administered (mailed) questionnair… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
58
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
58
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the mechanisms responsible for the associations of delayed age at first birth with poor prognostic features are unknown, continuous exposure to cyclic hormones uninterrupted by the dramatic differentiation and remodelling effects of pregnancy on breast tissue might play an important role. In contrast to some previous reports (LiVolsi et al, 1982;Ewertz and Duffy, 1988;Stalsberg et al, 1989), we and others (Morrison, 1976;Wohlfahrt et al, 1999) did not find that late age at first full-term birth was more strongly associated with lobular as compared with ductal carcinoma, NOS. As previously reported, we found that HRT use was more strongly related to lobular (Gapstur et al, 1999;Li et al, 2000;Chen et al, 2002;Daling et al, 2002;Newcomb et al, 2002;Li et al, 2003;Newcomer et al, 2003) and tubular (Manjer et al, 2001) carcinomas than to other histopathologic types.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the mechanisms responsible for the associations of delayed age at first birth with poor prognostic features are unknown, continuous exposure to cyclic hormones uninterrupted by the dramatic differentiation and remodelling effects of pregnancy on breast tissue might play an important role. In contrast to some previous reports (LiVolsi et al, 1982;Ewertz and Duffy, 1988;Stalsberg et al, 1989), we and others (Morrison, 1976;Wohlfahrt et al, 1999) did not find that late age at first full-term birth was more strongly associated with lobular as compared with ductal carcinoma, NOS. As previously reported, we found that HRT use was more strongly related to lobular (Gapstur et al, 1999;Li et al, 2000;Chen et al, 2002;Daling et al, 2002;Newcomb et al, 2002;Li et al, 2003;Newcomer et al, 2003) and tubular (Manjer et al, 2001) carcinomas than to other histopathologic types.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, combined oestrogen and progestin hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (Li et al, 2000;Chen et al, 2002;Daling et al, 2002;Newcomb et al, 2002;Li et al, 2003;Newcomer et al, 2003), and possibly late age at first birth (LiVolsi et al, 1982;Ewertz and Duffy, 1988;Stalsberg et al, 1989) may be more strongly associated with lobular as compared to ductal carcinomas. Epidemiologic data also suggest that hormone-related risk factors vary by hormone receptor status (Althuis et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our observation of a positive association between age at menopause and breast cancer risk is also consistent with several previous reports (Ewertz and Duffy, 1988;Parsa and Parsa, 2009;Phipps et al, 2010). Late menopause after the age of 50 years leads to an increase in ovulatory cycles and subsequently higher endogenous estrogen levels over a woman's lifetime, with an increased vulnerability to environmental carcinogens, and thus increasing BC risk.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This increased risk is surprising because the majority of women in China have several induced abortions after a first live birth, 21 which is known to be protective against breast cancer. 7,22,23 The extremely high odds ratios reported for known breast cancer risk factors such as age at first birth older than 30 years (OR ϭ 7.8, 95% CI 3.2-19.0) and family history of breast cancer (OR ϭ 9.0, 95% CI 2.6 -31.5) found in this study also raised concerns about the methodology used in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%