2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2017.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of depression among Bangladeshi type 2 diabetic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, predefined thresholds for normal (0–7), borderline abnormal (8-10), and abnormal (11-21) levels were used to categorize levels of anxiety and depression [ 43 ]. The cutoff (> 8) utilized to screen for symptoms for anxiety and depression for each subscale was the same as used previously in the Bangladesh population [ 44 , 46 ]. In the present study, Cronbach’s alpha of the anxiety and depression subscales were 0.80 and 0.70, respectively, and overall Cronbach’s alpha of the HADS scale was 0.83, indicating good reliability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, predefined thresholds for normal (0–7), borderline abnormal (8-10), and abnormal (11-21) levels were used to categorize levels of anxiety and depression [ 43 ]. The cutoff (> 8) utilized to screen for symptoms for anxiety and depression for each subscale was the same as used previously in the Bangladesh population [ 44 , 46 ]. In the present study, Cronbach’s alpha of the anxiety and depression subscales were 0.80 and 0.70, respectively, and overall Cronbach’s alpha of the HADS scale was 0.83, indicating good reliability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw scores for each subscale are summed as total scores ranging from 0 to 21 for each subscale. The present study employed the Bangla HADS described recently [44]. The most widely used standardized translation procedure, proposed by Beaton et al (2000), was used to perform the back translation for this scale [45].…”
Section: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Hads)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw scores for each subscale are summed as total scores ranging from 0 to 21 for each sub-scale. The present study employed the Bangla HADS described recently [29]. The most widely used standardized translation, proposed by Beaton et al (2000), was used to perform the back translation for this scale [30].…”
Section: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Hads)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, predefined thresholds for normal (0-7), borderline abnormal (8-10), and abnormal (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)) levels were used to categorize levels of anxiety and depression [28]. The cutoff (>8) utilized to screen for symptoms for anxiety and depression for each sub-scale was the same as used previously in the Bangladesh population [29,31]. In the present study, Cronbach's alpha of the anxiety and depression subscales were 0.80 and 0.70, respectively, and overall Cronbach's alpha of the HADS scale was 0.83, indicating good reliability.…”
Section: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Hads)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, the relative risk for incident MDD associated with T2D is only 15% (Mezuk et al, ). A recent study reported in the Bangladeshi population that people with T2D have seven times more coexisting MDD in comparison to subjects without T2D (Chowdhury et al, ). Das et al () reported the rate of MDD to be 46.15% in T2D patients.…”
Section: Mental and Metabolic Comorbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%