2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00624.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of diabetes in siblings of index cases with Type 2 diabetes: implications for genetic studies

Abstract: The selection of families with non-obese index cases and vertical transmission of diabetes through three generations may improve the success of efforts to map susceptibility genes for Type 2 diabetes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
67
2
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
67
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the 20 loci identified by GWA studies have small λ s values (Table 3), with a λ s value in combination of only about 1.08-1.10. The expected λ s value for type 2 diabetes appears to be somewhere between 1.2 and 6 [96,[117][118][119][120]. Therefore, we must conclude that much of the genetic cause of type 2 diabetes remains unidentified and the GWA results should be seen as complementing, not replacing, the linkage analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is because the 20 loci identified by GWA studies have small λ s values (Table 3), with a λ s value in combination of only about 1.08-1.10. The expected λ s value for type 2 diabetes appears to be somewhere between 1.2 and 6 [96,[117][118][119][120]. Therefore, we must conclude that much of the genetic cause of type 2 diabetes remains unidentified and the GWA results should be seen as complementing, not replacing, the linkage analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The similarity in r g can be taken to indicate that only a portion of the genes that contribute to BMI and type 2 diabetes mellitus are the same. While the ratio of the risk of type 2 diabetes in siblings of patients with the disease compared with disease risk in the general population has varied between 3 and 4 [18], genome-wide association studies have estimated the λ attributable to all loci for type 2 diabetes to be only little above one, i.e. these loci have been estimated to explain 5 to 10% of the inherited predisposition [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long follow-up of a population-based twin cohort in our study also enabled coverage of the near-life-time risk of type 2 diabetes, hence improving the possibility of detecting diabetes cases that would have remained unnoticed in a cross sectional set-up. The prospective study design, moreover, enabled us to steer clear of problems of information loss due to study participants not attending follow-up visits, as has been the case for most cohort studies of type 2 diabetes incidence [18]. Thus, the combination of a large population-based twin sample, together with the nationwide diabetes medication register, provides at least as reliable tools for the study of type 2 diabetes epidemiology as any of the smaller scale studies using direct measurement of blood glucose values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest risk in firstdegree relatives, compared to the general population, persists even after removal from the family of origin, for example, as a result of adoption. Furthermore, in identical monozygotic twins (with identical genetic makeup), the concordance rate for the disease approaches 100%, much higher than that seen in non-identical (dizygotic) twins or among siblings [7] . Genetic predisposition in T2DM is also supported by the observation that differences in disease prevalence rates exist among populations, even after migration of entire ethnic groups to another country, thus independent from the environmental influences [8] .…”
Section: Topic Highlightmentioning
confidence: 99%