2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 2015
DOI: 10.1109/smc.2015.415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of Falling Assessment on Different Types of Ground Using the Instrumented TUG

Abstract: Abstract-Degradation of postural control observed with aging is responsible for balance problems in the elderly, especially during the activity of walking. This gradual loss of performance generates abnormal gait, and therefore increases the risk of falling. This risk worsens in people with neuronal pathologies like Parkinson and Ataxia diseases. Many clinical tests are used for fall assessment such as the Timed up and go (TUG) test. Recently, many works have improved this test by using instrumentation, especi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, if the current stride data is close to the computed average data, the ratio will tend to zero and the actual value (the ROFA score) will be high indicating a low risk. Based on the literature [ 70 , 74 ], this TUG score can be interpreted in three, four, or five levels. For this study, we suggested the interpretation as follows: 0 to 24 indicates a very high fall risk; 25 to 49 indicates a high fall risk; 50 to 74 indicates a medium fall risk; 75 to 99 indicates a low fall risk; 100 indicates a very low fall risk.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, if the current stride data is close to the computed average data, the ratio will tend to zero and the actual value (the ROFA score) will be high indicating a low risk. Based on the literature [ 70 , 74 ], this TUG score can be interpreted in three, four, or five levels. For this study, we suggested the interpretation as follows: 0 to 24 indicates a very high fall risk; 25 to 49 indicates a high fall risk; 50 to 74 indicates a medium fall risk; 75 to 99 indicates a low fall risk; 100 indicates a very low fall risk.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these sensors are exploited to compute a risk level associated to a risk of falling. A 16-bits architecture microcontroller is included for computing, in real time, the risk level using different algorithms such as neural network [48], fuzzy logic [49] and our closed-loop balance model presented in this paper.…”
Section: A Instrumented Insolementioning
confidence: 99%