2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-019-01206-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of Long-Term Mortality for Complex Chronic Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Population-Based e-Cohort Observational Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study indicate a higher incidence of ICH in an emerging and vulnerable population subgroup, such as CCPs, than in both general and elderly populations. Data on time trends for ICH in the general population indicate no significant changes in the incidence of ICH over the last two decades [6,15], but the incidence density of ICH was 5to-60-fold higher than that observed in the general population, both within the study area and worldwide (Table 6) [6,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Comparisons between studies are difficult due to several interacting and overlapping emerging risk factors and aetiologies, new imaging techniques, demographic changes, comorbidities and associated treatments, different target populations, and the lack of a standardized methodology for data recording and exploitation, which makes it impossible to make adjustments to the incidences for different series of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The results of the present study indicate a higher incidence of ICH in an emerging and vulnerable population subgroup, such as CCPs, than in both general and elderly populations. Data on time trends for ICH in the general population indicate no significant changes in the incidence of ICH over the last two decades [6,15], but the incidence density of ICH was 5to-60-fold higher than that observed in the general population, both within the study area and worldwide (Table 6) [6,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Comparisons between studies are difficult due to several interacting and overlapping emerging risk factors and aetiologies, new imaging techniques, demographic changes, comorbidities and associated treatments, different target populations, and the lack of a standardized methodology for data recording and exploitation, which makes it impossible to make adjustments to the incidences for different series of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Literature comparison remains difficult since there is a lack of ICH incidence studies in populations with high multimorbidity and complexity, such as the GMA-4. In our study area, two studies conducted with complex chronic patients [ 14 , 15 ] showed a greater incidence of ICH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Recent studies from our setting show that complex chronic patients are a high-risk group for ICH, with ICH incidences from 5 to 60 times higher than the general population. Notably, the HAS-BLED has shown high sensitivity in this subgroup of population for the identification of individuals at high risk of ICH [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the change trend of chronic diseases with age is a critical way to control them. In the former researches, morbidity and mortality are the mostly used indicators to measure the diseases [ 3 6 ]. But after Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (GBD study 2010) published the measurement of Disabled Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) of 291 diseases and injuries, DALYs become a novel indicator to evaluate the chronic diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%