Risk of lung cancer in relation to various metrics of smoking history: a case-control study in Montreal

Abstract

BackgroundFew epidemiologic findings are as well established as the association between smoking and lung cancer. It is therefore somewhat surprising that there is not yet a clear consensus about the exposure-response relationships between various metrics of smoking and lung cancer risk. In part this is due to heterogeneity of how exposure-response results have been presented and the relative paucity of published results using any particular metric of exposure. The purposes of this study are: to provide new data on smoking-lung cancer associations and to explore the relative impact of different dimensions of smoking history on lung cancer risk.MethodsBased on a large lung cancer case-control study (1203 cases and 1513 controls) conducted in Montreal in 1996–2000, we estimated the lifetime prevalence of smoking and odds ratios in relation to several smoking metrics, both categorical and continuous based on multivariable unconditional logistic regression.ResultsOdds ratios (ORs) for ever vs never smoking were 7.82 among males and 11.76 among females. ORs increased sharply with every metric of smoking examined, more so for duration than for daily intensity. In models using continuous smoking variables, all metrics had strong effects on OR and mutual adjustment among smoking metrics did not noticeably attenuate the OR estimates, indicating that each metric carries some independent risk-related information. Among all the models tested, the one based on a smoking index that integrates several smoking dimensions, provided the best fitting model. Similar patterns were observed for the different histologic types of lung cancer.ConclusionsThis study provides many estimates of exposure-response relationships between smoking and lung cancer; these can be used in future meta-analyses. Irrespective of the histologic type of lung cancer and the smoking metric examined, high levels of smoking led to high levels of risk, for both men and women.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-5144-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The relationship between cigarette smoking and the tongue microbiome in an East Asian population

“…We also described the predicted percentage of forced expiratory volume in one second and pack-year index (the number of cigarettes smoked per day divided by 20, multiplied by the number of years of smoking) across the three groups. Pack-years index was reported to be related to the risk of lung cancer [11]. Oral health status was examined by dentists, and the natural tooth number, presence of dental caries and periodontal status were recorded.…”

The Associations of Fruit and Vegetable Intake with Lung Cancer Risk in Participants with Different Smoking Status: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies

“…Cigarette smoking is considered as the main cause of lung cancer. The lung cancer incidence is higher in men, and may be caused by the higher consumption of cigarettes compared to women [2]. So far, smoking is still the principal reason of lung cancer.…”

Can smoking duration alone replace pack-years to predict the risk of smoking-related oncogenic mutations in non-small cell lung cancer? A cross-sectional study in Japan

“…A long smoking history is almost always self-reported, and it is conceivable that the lower predictive value of smoking intensity is due to the fact that smoking duration may be recalled and reported with greater accuracy than average daily intensity over a lifetime of smoking history. 23 We believe that the duration of smoking is more easily and accurately recalled than the average number of cigarettes smoked per day, which tends to fluctuate over time. It is also harder to accurately quantify the number of cigarettes smoked per day, and the measurements are correlated poorly with the biochemical assessments of smoking exposure.…”

“…The relative contributions of smoking duration and cigarettes smoked per day to lung cancer incidence have been examined but not in terms of the incidence of driver gene alterations. 21 22 Smoking duration was more strongly associated with lung cancer development than cigarettes smoked per day, 23 but no comparisons were made in terms of pack-years. It is accepted that a longer duration of smoking is associated with increasing accumulation of genetic and epigenetic changes.…”