2014
DOI: 10.1097/ana.0b013e31829b677c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of Needle-Stick Injuries Associated With the Use of Subdermal Needle Electrodes During Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring

Abstract: Needle-stick exposure from subdermal needle electrodes during IONM is an infrequent but distressing event occurring in 0.34% of our study group and was not limited to the IONM technologist. Although no infections occurred as a result of needle-stick exposure in this study, steps to minimize needle sticks should be taken during IONM.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding sharps injuries from IONM needles not specifically attributed to those in OO, our annual sharps injuries incidence (0.3%-0.5%) is on par with that published in the literature. 5 Strikingly, this rate did not appreciably change over the 3 years evaluated; even during the year with a significant number of additional sharps injuries from needles in OO, the incidences of sharps injuries NOT including those from OO was still 0.5%. Our technologists use a variety of safety measures to prevent sharps injuries, such placing corkscrew electrodes for the scalp, covering needles with specially labeled tape (NeedleTape; Marea Enterprises, Inc, Agoura Hills, CA), and warning other staff members of the presence of needles before patient positioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding sharps injuries from IONM needles not specifically attributed to those in OO, our annual sharps injuries incidence (0.3%-0.5%) is on par with that published in the literature. 5 Strikingly, this rate did not appreciably change over the 3 years evaluated; even during the year with a significant number of additional sharps injuries from needles in OO, the incidences of sharps injuries NOT including those from OO was still 0.5%. Our technologists use a variety of safety measures to prevent sharps injuries, such placing corkscrew electrodes for the scalp, covering needles with specially labeled tape (NeedleTape; Marea Enterprises, Inc, Agoura Hills, CA), and warning other staff members of the presence of needles before patient positioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Although it is somewhat difficult to study, rates of sharps injuries NOT reported to occupational health have been estimated to range from 18.5% to 95%. 5 At one institution, surgical techs and OR nurses most frequently reported every sharps injury they sustained, whereas surgical residents least frequently reported injuries. 2 Several studies have found that a "time-consuming process" and perception of a "low-risk" incident were barriers to reporting sharps injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, no needle‐related complications occurred during IONM. Notably, a risk for needle‐stick injury exists in the use of needle electrodes during IONM 20 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, a risk for needle-stick injury exists in the use of needle electrodes during IONM. 20 This study has several limitations including the following: its retrospective nature, lack of external branch of superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN) data, and the comparison of two different recording-side systems applied in different patients. For more confident and accurate results, a study could be designed to use two different recording-side systems in the same patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%