2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of Premature Atherosclerotic Disease in Patients With Monogenic Versus Polygenic Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
112
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
7
112
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to additional genetic factors impacting expressivity, we assessed the impact of more common polygenic variation on carriers of monogenic variants and found significant contributions for both high HDL cholesterol and high triglyceride levels (P<0.05). These results add to a growing body of research supporting a significant polygenic contribution to monogenic risk 7,39,48,49 . As such analyses were restricted to carriers of monogenic variants, power was limited, and it will be important to investigate in even larger datasets.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…With regard to additional genetic factors impacting expressivity, we assessed the impact of more common polygenic variation on carriers of monogenic variants and found significant contributions for both high HDL cholesterol and high triglyceride levels (P<0.05). These results add to a growing body of research supporting a significant polygenic contribution to monogenic risk 7,39,48,49 . As such analyses were restricted to carriers of monogenic variants, power was limited, and it will be important to investigate in even larger datasets.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…An increased CVD risk, however, was not detected for the fraction of mutation negative patients in that same study. 47 Paquette et al reported similar results using a genetic risk score comprised of 192 SNPs associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) which were found to be strongly associated with CVD events in 725 FH mutation positive patients. 48 In clinical practice a score like this could be used for screening for "general CVD Iacocca & Hegele et al (2017) 51,52 leads to analogous conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In a registry-based prospective study of 626 patients with at least "possible" FH, as determined by the commonly used Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Score, patients with mutation-positive FH and a polygenic risk score ≥ 80th percentile had the greatest increase in risk, followed by those with mutation-positive FH and no increase in the polygenic risk score (Figure 3). 77 Mutation-negative patients with polygenic hypercholesterolaemia alone were not at increased risk when compared with patients with neither finding. In cascade screening, patients without an FH phenotype may have similarly high polygenic scores to the index case.…”
Section: Polygenic Hypercholesterolaemiamentioning
confidence: 84%