This article refers to 'Risk of readmission and death after hospitalization for worsening heart failure: Role of post-discharge follow-up visits in a real-world study from the Grand Est Region of France' by G. Baudry et al., published in this issue on pages 342-354.For patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF), the transition from inpatient to outpatient care has long been recognized as a high-risk period. Indeed, hospitalization for HF is a sentinel event in the natural history of HF, with approximately one in four patients dead or rehospitalized within 30 days of discharge. However, apart from the progressive nature of the HF disease state, other challenges frequently complicate the HF patient's transition from the hospital. Medication regimens can be complex, comorbidities can be severe, and communication between care teams can be challenging. To optimize the inpatient to outpatient transition, early clinician post-discharge follow-up has been recommended by HF guidelines. For example, the European Society of Cardiology recommends a follow-up visit within 1-2 weeks after discharge. 1 Likewise, the US guidelines recommend early follow-up within 7 days of hospital discharge in an effort to optimize care and reduce rehospitalization, and have made such appointments a quality measure. 2 However, despite inclusion within society guidelines, the evidence supporting the effectiveness of early post-discharge follow-up to reduce HF readmissions or improve care is modest and far from definitive. Indeed, US guidelines acknowledge the Class 2A recommendation for early follow-up is supported by non-randomized observational data. 2 Likewise, the HF literature contains many examples of randomized trials of 'common sense' early post-discharge follow-up and transitional care interventions that have been proven ineffective. In some cases, even seemingly benign interventions such as post-discharge telephone calls or alerting outpatient clinicians of patient discharges have been associated with the unintended consequence of increased readmissions. 3 Yet despite the modest evidence, for many health systems,The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of the European Journal of Heart Failure or of the European Society of Cardiology.