2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of recurrence after nephrectomy: Comparison of predictive ability of validated risk models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their ability to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) has only been validated in a mono-institutional European cohort of 127 chRCC patients [ 16 ]. We assessed the ability of these prognostic models to predict CSS in a population-based North American cohort relying on the 2000–2019 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database [ 21 , 22 ]. Moreover, we developed and externally validated a novel prognostic nomogram for individual prediction of CSS in chRCC patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their ability to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) has only been validated in a mono-institutional European cohort of 127 chRCC patients [ 16 ]. We assessed the ability of these prognostic models to predict CSS in a population-based North American cohort relying on the 2000–2019 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database [ 21 , 22 ]. Moreover, we developed and externally validated a novel prognostic nomogram for individual prediction of CSS in chRCC patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%