2022
DOI: 10.1111/ina.13012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 in a car cabin assessed through 3D CFD simulations

Abstract: In this study, the risk of infection from SARS‐CoV‐2 Delta variant of passengers sharing a car cabin with an infected subject for a 30‐min journey is estimated through an integrated approach combining a recently developed predictive emission‐to‐risk approach and a validated CFD numerical model numerically solved using the open‐source OpenFOAM software. Different scenarios were investigated to evaluate the effect of the infected subject position within the car cabin, the airflow rate of the HVAC system, the HVA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(195 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The novel aspect of the approach is the a priori evaluation of the viral emission of the infected subject on the basis of the viral load, the expiratory flow rate (influenced by the activity level), and the particle volume concentration expelled by the infectious person (affected by the expiratory activity, i.e., speaking, breathing, etc.). Major details of this predictive approach are reported in our previous papers and are not repeated here for the sake of brevity (32,33,(35)(36)(37). Figure 2 shows the comparison between the RRs observed in the investigated classrooms and those estimated through the theoretical predictive approach for a specific scenario as a function of the ventilation rate per person.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The novel aspect of the approach is the a priori evaluation of the viral emission of the infected subject on the basis of the viral load, the expiratory flow rate (influenced by the activity level), and the particle volume concentration expelled by the infectious person (affected by the expiratory activity, i.e., speaking, breathing, etc.). Major details of this predictive approach are reported in our previous papers and are not repeated here for the sake of brevity (32,33,(35)(36)(37). Figure 2 shows the comparison between the RRs observed in the investigated classrooms and those estimated through the theoretical predictive approach for a specific scenario as a function of the ventilation rate per person.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, identifying high-risk areas in a grocery store based on infected individuals along a defined route and emitting viral aerosols in the range of 0.3 to 3 μm 27 also did not incorporate size distributions of exhaled droplets as well as the evaporation of droplets after emission. Simulations in passenger car cabins estimate the risk of infection from SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant during breathing and speaking in the presence of different ventilation modes 28 used particle sizes between 2.4 and 90 μm with an assumption that the droplets evaporate as soon as they are emitted. However, in the simulations presented here trajectories of exhaled droplets differ from those of residual droplet nuclei as a result of size-dependent competing forces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the many studies using CFD to investigate airborne infection risk, many have focussed on healthcare settings [ [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] ], and other settings [ [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] ]. Good practice guidance to set up CFD simulations applicable to industrial practices to inform design against airborne infection risk is of utmost importance and currently considered a ‘work in progress’.…”
Section: Methodology Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%