2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.36644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of Subsequent Stroke Among Patients Receiving Outpatient vs Inpatient Care for Transient Ischemic Attack

Abstract: IMPORTANCETransient ischemic attack (TIA) often indicates a high risk of subsequent cerebral ischemic events. Timely preventive measures improve the outcome. OBJECTIVE To estimate and compare the risk of subsequent ischemic stroke among patients with TIA or minor ischemic stroke (mIS) by care setting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(821 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, further studies to ascertain the impact of various ASA doses on ASA responsiveness are needed. Furthermore, this study is different from Cox et al (or indeed Frelinger or Mree et al) [ 41 , 43 , 46 ] as it was conducted in patients with acute stroke or TIA rather than healthy volunteers or patients with stable CAD, as there is a considerable risk of stroke recurrence among admitted patients in initial period [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, further studies to ascertain the impact of various ASA doses on ASA responsiveness are needed. Furthermore, this study is different from Cox et al (or indeed Frelinger or Mree et al) [ 41 , 43 , 46 ] as it was conducted in patients with acute stroke or TIA rather than healthy volunteers or patients with stable CAD, as there is a considerable risk of stroke recurrence among admitted patients in initial period [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The origins of heterogeneity were further examined by subgroup analyses. Publication biases were determined by using Begg’s and Egger’s tests ( 30 , 31 ). p > 0.05 indicated no publication bias, while p < 0.05 was judged to be a statistical publication bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, studies attempted to deploy strategies to maximize the efficiency of referral systems and minimize waiting periods and loss of follow-up. However, our prior meta-analysis [ 9 ] demonstrated a no-show rate of 36% among referred patients with suspected TIA or minor stroke but a minimal risk of complications while waiting for an outpatient visit. Choice of appropriate brain imaging and cardiac workups, administration of first-line medications, such as aspirin, deciding whether and when a neurologist should be involved in diagnosis, and the potential roles of nurse practitioners are other challenges in defining the optimal referral system for outpatient management of patients with TIA [ 31 , 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Challenges Of Outpatient Tia Management and Possible Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%