Risk perception in performance based contracts and the influence of experience

Abstract

Purpose In performance-based contracting (PBC), the provider is paid according to outcomes for its customer, and therefore assumes responsibility for customer risks. Previous studies have revealed that risk exposure is a fundamental influencing factor. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to analyze how previous experience with PBC influences the perception of risks. Design/methodology/approach This research is based on a cross-industry study. Factor analysis and discriminant analysis are used to reveal to what extent experience influences PBC risk factors. Findings It is confirmed that risk perception differs significantly according to previous PBC experience. Thus, significant learning effects are identified in the PBC context. Research limitations/implications Experiential learning in PBC can explain entry barriers to PBC faced by new buyers with low levels of experience. Although the internal validity of the sample is high, as all analyzed cases represent PBC buying companies, there are limitations related to external validity. Practical implications To manage risks this study provides a structure (12 risks, 3 aggregated factors), which could be used for risk evaluation and strategic and operative risk management. Other implications recommend, e.g., to collaborate with a PBC “veteran” when entering into PBC, as this boosts the level of PBC-related experience. Originality/value The findings of this study contribute to identifying PBC risks through the explorative statistical assessment of these PBC risk factors.

Capability development measures adopted by public sector organizations in PPP projects delivery in developing countries

“…The sample size subjected to factor analysis of variables was lower than the recommendations of the rule of thumb regarding a minimum size (N) that refers to ratio of sample size to variable (STV) of 5:1 and 10:1. However, the STV for this study which is 2.96:1 (77 cases to 26 variables) agrees with some recommendations on the adequacy of STV of 2:1 or 3:1 for factor analysis (Glas et al, 2019). Notwithstanding the statistical research on sample size in factor analysis, Bortz (2013) stressed the statistical adequacy and JOPP 20,2 interpretability of factor pattern where at least four loadings of one factor are greater than 0.6 regardless of the sample size.…”

Understanding the Impacts of Length of the Contract and Fleet Size on Spare Parts Level and Reliability Investments in Performance-based Contracting

“…We analyze how the supplier's decision is affected by contract length and fleet size in a mathematical model, adapted from , within the step revenue model, adapted from Nowicki et al (2008). In PBCs, although suppliers have more freedom to act, they start to shoulder risks based on their decision on how to provide targeted performance rates (Glas et al, 2019). Therefore, they have to consider all aspects of contracts' specialties that affect the outcome.…”

Down the drain: The dynamic interplay of governance adjustments addressing setbacks in large public–private projects

“…Risks may affect the performance of a project, […]. The project setback and associated decreasing project feasibility could subsequently cause parties to act opportunistically (Glas et al, 2019) Increased project performance decreases project setback…”